Evaluation criteria for the Unified State Examination in the Russian language tests. Criteria for testing and evaluating the Unified State Examination in the Russian language

I. Structure of the examination paper

The examination paper in the Russian language consists of three parts:

Part 1(A1-A30) contains 30 tasks. For each of them there are 4 possible answers, only one of which is correct.
Part 2(B1-B8) contains 8 tasks, the answers to which must be formulated independently.
Part 3(C1) consists of one task and is a small written work according to the text (essay).

Long-term statistics show that the most difficult tasks of the Russian language examination paper for all participants are found in part 2, the easiest - in part 1.

Part 1 work (A1-A30) checks the mastery of graduates educational material at basic difficulty level.
All tasks parts 2(B1-B8) refer to high level difficulties.
Part 3(C1 - essay) is a task of an increased level of complexity.

II. Checking the examination paper

Parts 1 and 2 checked using a computer. Therefore, you should pay attention to the correct formatting of answers.

This small written work on the text (essay) is performed based on the source text and checked by experts.
- An essay-reasoning has a clear structure and logic and must be built according to certain laws: it must have a thesis and arguments;
- the volume of the essay is at least 150 words. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted (scored with zero points), the task is considered uncompleted;
- the essay should be written neatly, in legible handwriting;
work written without relying on the text read (not based on the given text) is not graded;
- if the essay is a retelling or completely rewritten of the original text without any comments, then such work is graded 0 points.

III. Assessment of examination work

The correct answer, depending on the complexity of each task, is awarded one or more points. The points received for all completed tasks are summed up.

Each correct answer in the tasks of part 1 (A) brings 1 primary point. If two or more answers are indicated (including the correct one), an incorrect answer or no answer, 0 points are given.

For the correct answer to tasks B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7, 1 point is given, for an incorrect answer or no answer - 0 points.
Task B8 is graded on a scale from 0 to 4 points. For each correctly indicated number corresponding to the number of the term from the list, the examinee receives 1 point:

4 points: no errors
3 points: 1 mistake made
2 points: 2 mistakes made
1 point: only one number is correct
0 points: completely incorrect answer (wrong set of numbers) or no answer).

For completing the task of part 3 (C1), the maximum number of primary points is 23.
The results of parts 1 and 2 are processed automatically.
Part 3 assignment © is checked by two independent experts. If the experts disagree in their assessment of the work, a third expert is appointed.

The maximum number of primary points for the entire work is 64 (100 test points).

Ahead 2018-2019 academic year which will be a graduation for many Russian schoolchildren, who today are already concerned about the successful passage of the Unified State Exam and successful admission to a good university.

We will tell you how exam papers are checked in different subjects, how the scale for converting Unified State Exam points into grades works, and what innovations you can expect in 2019.

Principles for assessing work on the Unified State Exam 2019

Over the course of several recent years Unified State Exam system in a number of subjects has undergone significant changes and has been brought to an optimal (in the opinion of the organizers) format, which makes it possible to fully assess the volume of knowledge of a graduate in a particular subject.

In 2018-2019, no fundamental changes are expected and it is safe to say that the same principles as in 2017-2018 will be applied to evaluate the work of graduates:

1. automated verification of forms;
2. involving experts in checking tasks with detailed answers.

How does a computer evaluate?

The first part of the examination paper involves a short answer to the questions posed, which the Unified State Examination participant must enter on a special answer form.

Important! Before starting work, be sure to read the rules for filling out the form, as incorrectly completed work will not pass the automated check.

It is quite difficult to challenge the result of a computer check. If the work was not counted due to the fault of a participant who filled out the form incorrectly, the result is considered unsatisfactory.

How do experts rate it?

In many subjects, in addition to the test part, there are tasks that require a full, detailed answer. Since it is impossible to automate the process of checking such answers, experts are involved in the verification - experienced teachers with extensive work experience.

When checking the Unified State Exam, the teacher does not know (and even with a strong desire cannot find out) whose work is in front of him and in which city (region) it was written. Testing is carried out on the basis of uniform assessment criteria developed specifically for each subject. Each work is checked by two experts. If the experts’ opinions coincide, the assessment is put on the form, but if independent appraisers disagree, then a third expert is involved in the verification, whose opinion will be decisive.

That is why it is important to write legibly and accurately so that there is no ambiguous interpretation of words and phrases.

Primary and test scores

Based on the test results, the Unified State Exam participant is awarded a certain number of primary points, which are then converted into text points (points for the entire test). Different subjects have different maximum primary points, depending on the number of tasks. But after giving the result according to the appropriate table, the Unified State Examination participant receives a final test score, which is the official result of his final tests (maximum 100 points).

So, in order to pass the exam, it is enough to achieve the established minimum threshold of the primary score:

Based on these numbers, you can accurately understand that the exam has been passed. But what grade? The 2018 online scale will help you with this, designed specifically for converting primary Unified State Exam scores into test scores, which will also be relevant for the 2019 results. A convenient calculator can be found on the website 4ege.ru.

Announcement of official results

Graduates are always concerned with the question of how quickly they can find out what result was obtained during the test and what the scale for converting the points scored on the Unified State Exam into traditional grades will be in 2019.

Teachers often take it upon themselves to reassure students by working through the tasks of the Unified State Exam tickets immediately after the exam and assessing the quality of the students’ work and the amount of initial points scored. Official results must be waited for 8-14 days, according to the established regulations for the Unified State Exam 2019. On average, organizers approve the following inspection schedules:

• 3 days to check the work;
• 5-6 days for processing information at the federal level;
• 1 working day for approval of the results of the State Examination;
• 3 days to post results online and transfer data to educational institutions.

In the event of unforeseen situations and technical problems, these deadlines may be revised.

You can find out your owl score:

• directly at your school;
• on the portal check.ege.edu.ru;
• on the website gosuslugi.ru.

Converting points to grades

Since 2009, Unified State Examination results are not included in the graduate certificate. Therefore, today there is no official state system converting the Unified State Examination result into a grade on a school 5-point scale. As part of the entrance campaign, the test score obtained in the exam is always summed up and taken into account. But many students are still interested in finding out how they passed the exam - 3 or 4, 4 or 5. For this, there is a special table that details the correspondence for each of the 100 points in each subject.

There is no maximum number of words in an essay. If the essay contains less than 250 words (all words, including function words, are included in the calculation), then a “failure” is given for failure to fulfill requirement No. 1 and a “failure” for the work as a whole (such an essay is not checked against the evaluation criteria).

Requirement No. 2. “Independence in writing the final essay”

The final essay is completed independently. It is not allowed to copy an essay (fragments of an essay) from any source or reproduce someone else’s text from memory (the work of another participant, a text published in paper and (or) electronic form, etc.).

Direct or indirect quotation is allowed with a mandatory link to the source (the link is given in free form). The volume of citations should not exceed the volume own text participant.

If the essay is recognized as not independent, then a “failure” is given for failure to fulfill requirement No. 2 and a “failure” for the work as a whole (such an essay is not checked against the assessment criteria).

The final essay that meets the established requirements is assessed according to five criteria:

1. “Relevance to the topic”;
2. “Argumentation. Attracting literary material";
3. “Composition and logic of reasoning”;
4. “Quality of written speech”;
5. "Literacy".

To receive a “pass” for the final essay, you must receive a “pass” for criteria No. 1 and No. 2 (giving a “fail” for one of these criteria automatically leads to a “failure” for the work as a whole), as well as an additional “pass” for one from other criteria.

Criterion No. 1 “Relevance to the topic”

This criterion aims to check the content of the essay.

The participant must reason on the proposed topic, choosing the way to reveal it (for example, answer the question posed in the topic, or reflect on the proposed problem, etc.).

“Fail” is given only if the essay does not correspond to the topic or does not show the specific purpose of the statement, that is, the communicative intent. In all other cases, a “credit” is given.

Criterion No. 2 “Argumentation. Attracting literary material"

This criterion aims to test the ability to use literary material ( works of art, diaries, memoirs, journalism, works of oral folk art (with the exception of small genres), other literary sources) to argue their position.

The participant must build an argument, using at least one work of domestic or world literature for argumentation, choosing his own path of using literary material; at the same time, it can show a different level of understanding of a literary text: from elements of semantic analysis (for example, themes, issues, plot, characters, etc.) to comprehensive analysis works in the unity of form and content and its interpretation in terms of the chosen topic.

“Fail” is given if the essay was written without the use of literary material or the content of the work is significantly distorted, or literary works are only mentioned in the work, without becoming a basis for argumentation. In all other cases, a “credit” is given.

Criterion No. 3 “Composition and logic of reasoning”

This criterion aims to test the ability to logically construct a reasoning on the proposed topic. The participant must maintain a balance between thesis and evidence.

A “failure” is given if gross logical violations interfere with understanding the meaning of what was said or if the thesis and evidence part is missing. In all other cases, a “credit” is given.

Criterion No. 4 “Quality of written speech”

This criterion aims to check the speech format of the text of the essay.

The participant must express thoughts accurately, using a variety of vocabulary and various grammatical structures, and, if necessary, use terms appropriately.

A “failure” is given if the low quality of speech (including speech errors) significantly complicates understanding the meaning of the essay. In all other cases, a “credit” is given.

Criterion No. 5 “Literacy”

This criterion allows you to assess the graduate’s literacy.

“Fail” is given if there are a total of more than five errors per 100 words: grammatical, spelling, punctuation.

The essay is assessed according to ten criteria and taking into account its volume and independence.

Criteria No. 1 and No. 2 are the main ones.

If, when checking an essay according to criterion No. 1 or No. 2, 0 points are given, then the essay is not checked further: 0 points are given for all other criteria.

Below are the criteria for assessing essays on the Unified State Exam in the Russian language for 2019. In the new demo versions in Russian 2019 assessment criteria were changed K2 And K4.

What can give you the most points for:

• 5 points - for a comment on the source text problem - K2
• 3 points - for literacy: spelling (K7) and punctuation (K8)

Argumentation of your own opinion on the problem - REMOVED in 2019!

Criteria for assessing the answer to task 27

K1 Formulation of source text problems

• 1 point. The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the source text. There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem.
• 0 points. The examinee was unable to correctly formulate any of the problems in the source text. *If the examinee did not formulate or formulated incorrectly (in one form or another in any part of the essay) one of the problems of the source text, then such work according to criteria K1–K4 is scored 0 points

K2 Commentary on the formulated problem of the source text

• 5 points. 2 examples-illustrations from the read text, important for understanding the problem. An explanation is given for the two examples given. A semantic connection between them is revealed. There are no factual errors related to understanding the source text problem in the commentary.
• 4 points. The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee cited no less 2 illustration examples from the read text that are important for understanding the problem. An explanation was given for the 2 examples given, but the semantic connection between them was not identified,
  or a semantic connection between the examples is identified, but an explanation is given for only one example. There are no factual errors related to understanding the source text problem in the commentary
• 3 points. The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee cited no less 2 illustration examples from the text read, important for understanding the problem, But an explanation is given for only one example, the semantic connection between the examples is not identified, or the examinee brought 1 example-illustration from the text read, important for understanding the problem, and gave an explanation for it. There are no factual errors related to understanding the source text problem in the commentary.
• 2 points. The examinee brought 2 illustration examples from the text read, important for understanding the problem, but did not explain their meaning.
• 1 point. The examinee brought 1 example-illustration from the text read, important for understanding the problem, but did not explain its meaning.
• 0 points. Examples and illustrations from the text read, important for understanding the problem, are not given, or
  the problem is commented without relying on the source text, or the commentary contains factual errors (one or more) related to understanding the source text, or another problem not formulated by the examinee was commented on, or instead of a commentary, a simple retelling of the text is given, or instead of a comment, a large fragment of the source text is quoted.

K3 Reflection of the position of the author of the source text

• 1 point. The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. There are no factual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text.
• 0 points. The position of the author of the source text by the examinee is formulated incorrectly, or the position of the author of the source text is not formulated.

K4 Attitude to the author’s position on the problem of the source text

• 1 point. The examinee expressed his attitude to the position of the author of the text on the problem (agreeing or disagreeing with the author) and substantiated it.
• 0 points. The examinee did not express his attitude to the position of the author of the text, or the examinee’s thoughts do not correspond to the formulated problem, or the examinee’s opinion is stated only formally (for example, “I agree / disagree with the author”)

II. Speech design of the essay

K5 Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation

• 2 points. The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, verbal coherence and consistency of presentation: - there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; - there are no violations of paragraph division of the text in the work.
• 1 point. The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, But 1 logical error was made, and/or There is 1 violation of paragraph division of the text in the work.
• 0 points. The examinee’s work reveals a communicative intent, But more than 1 allowed logical error, and/or There are 2 cases of violation of paragraph division of the text.

K6 Accuracy and expressiveness of speech

• 2 points. The work of the examinee is characterized by accuracy of expression of thought, variety grammatical structure speech. * The examinee receives the highest score for this criterion only if highest mark obtained according to criterion K10.
• 1 point. The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of expression of thoughts, But the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech can be traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, But there are violations of the accuracy of expression of thought.
• 0 points. The work of the examinee is characterized by a poor vocabulary and monotony of the grammatical structure of speech.

III. Literacy

K7 Compliance with spelling standards

• 3 points. There are no spelling errors (or 1 minor error).
• 2 points. No more than 2 mistakes were made.
• 1 point. 3-4 mistakes were made.
• 0 points. More than 4 errors were made.

K8 Compliance with punctuation standards

• 3 points. There are no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error).
• 2 points. 1–3 mistakes made
• 1 point. 4–5 mistakes were made.
• 0 points. More than 5 errors were made.

K9 Compliance with language norms

• 2 points. There are no grammatical errors.
• 1 point. 1-2 mistakes were made.
• 0 points. More than 2 errors were made.

K10 Compliance with speech norms

• 2 points. No more than 1 allowed speech error.
• 1 point. 2-3 mistakes were made.
• 0 points. More than 3 errors were made.

K11 Compliance with ethical standards

• 1 point. There are no ethical errors in the work.
• 0 points. Ethical errors were made (1 or more).

K12 Maintain factual accuracy in background material

• 1 point. There are no factual errors in the background material.
• 0 points. There were factual errors (1 or more) in the background material.

Maximum amount points for all written work (K1–K12) - 24 points.

• When assessing literacy (K7–K10), the length of the essay should be taken into account.When counting words, both independent and functional parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, “still” is one word, “still” is two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, “M.Yu. Lermontov” is one word). Any other symbols, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, “5 years” is one word, “five years” is two words.
• The assessment standards indicated in the table are developed for essays of 150–300 words. If the essay contains partially or completely rewritten by the examinee the text of the review of task 26 and/or information about the author of the text, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and/or information about the author of the text.
• If in an essay less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and is scored 0 points, the task is considered unfulfilled.
• When evaluating an essay ranging from 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) decreases.

2 points according to these criteria are given in the following cases:

• K7 – there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
• K8 – punctuation errors no (or one minor mistake was made).

1 point according to these criteria is given in the following cases:

• K7 – no more than two mistakes were made;
• K8 – one to three mistakes were made;
• K9 – no grammatical errors;
• K10 – no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to criteria K7–K12 is not given for work ranging from 70 to 150 words.

• If the essay is a retelling or completely rewritten of the original text without any comments, then such work on all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is scored 0 points.
• If the work, which is a rewritten or retold source text, contains fragments of the examinee’s text, then only the number of words that belong to the examinee is taken into account when checking. Work written without reference to the text read (not based on this text) is not graded.

Solve in Russian