home / Our children/ Facial vault actaeon. Facial vault

Facial vault actaeon. Facial vault

The Front Chronicle Code is a source of blasphemy and lies

(book review " Earthly life Our Lord Jesus Christ")

"Lycevoy Chronicle Code - the source of Truth"
“The Front Chronicle Code frees the soul from heresy”
German Sterligov (chairman of the OLDP)

Before starting to study this book, let’s go to the website of the publishing house “Akteon” (the publisher that distributes the commercial version of LLC) and see its availability there. There is no such book there. The title of the book “The Earthly Life of Our Lord Jesus Christ” and its layout are a product of the OLDP. Why this is important to note will be explained below.

Let's start reading.
Beginning of the book, page 4: “... and Alexander died” (Macedonian) “And then 4 subordinates of Alexander reigned. And Arrhidaeus, the brother of Alexander, who was called Philip, took Macedonia, and he reigned in Macedonia. Antipater reigned in Europe; in Egypt, Ptolemy, the son of Lag, that is, the Hare…………..”

Page 10 “And Romun Ermilai, the king of Rome, took Byzantium for himself and began to love her very much because of her beauty - he himself was good and smart, ………………..”

Page 16 “4th reign in Egypt. Then reigned 4 Ptolemy Euergetes the Father Loving, 25 years, under which Jewish people, the captive went to Egypt………………..”

Page 25 “As soon as Nikanor Seleucus defeated Antigonus Poliorkter, he began to create many cities. He began to build first by the Syrian Sea, and came to the sea……………….”

Page 35 “Reign 7th in Syria. After Seleucus, Demetrius of Seleucia reigned. 8th reign in Syria. After Demetrius, Alexander Valas reigned. Reign 9th in Syria. After Alexander……………………”

We remind you that you are reading the book “The Earthly Life of Our Lord Jesus Christ.”

Page 45 “An evil thing was revealed - the coming of Antiochus. After the victory he ordered………….”
Page 55 “And Antiochus came to Jerusalem, and he had 20,000 horsemen and 100,000 infantry……………”
Page 65 “Reign 22 in Syria. After Antiochus, the grandson of Grypus, Antiochus Euergetes reigned………….”
Page 75 “And the Roman nobles, having learned about this, appointed a strong second governor, named Scipio………….”
Page 85 “Reign 26th in Syria. And this Antiochus owned all this for 9 years………………….”

And only on page 129 did we finally reach the stated topic: “The Word of Holy Father Epiphanius about the life of the Holy Mother of God of our Lord Jesus Christ.” And the fun begins...

Page 140 “Mary was in Jerusalem in the temple of the Lord. And she was 14 years old when a woman’s weak nature manifests itself...” A very important clarification for raising children (and it is stated that LLS was created specifically for raising children). I can see a father in a stupor, to whom a young son or daughter asks a question about “female weak nature.” Besides. Everything that concerns God and the Most Holy Theotokos should be permeated with reverence and sacred awe, and I personally deeply doubt that Saint Epiphanius would have written exactly as it is written in this “source of truth.”

Further more.
Page 140 “.. So this explains the words of the Holy Virgin spoken to the Archangel Gabriel. After greeting him, he said to Her: “Thou shalt conceive a Son, and thou shalt call His name Jesus, and the Lord God shall give unto Him the throne of thy father David.” And so on".
Let’s open the Elisavetgrad Gospel (also charitablely distributed by the OLDP) and compare. Gospel of Luke: “And an angel came to her and said: Rejoice, rejoice, the Lord is with you. Blessed are You among women. Having seen it, she was embarrassed about his words and thought about what this kiss would be like. And the angel said to her: Do not be afraid of Mariam. Find grace from God. And behold, you conceived in your womb and gave birth to a Son, and you called His name Jesus. This one will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give him the throne of his father David.”

Before this, in Z.M.I.H. A third of the book told us about the Roman kings, about how they lived, who they loved and who they hated, who and how they killed. There was not much room for Jesus Christ and His Most Pure Mother in the “source of truth.” Therefore, we are given a mocking snippet of the great moment of the Annunciation and end it with a savory spit of “and so on.” By the way, let’s remember this mocking “and so on.” In the process of studying LLS we will encounter it more than once.

“Thou shalt conceive a Son, and thou shalt call His name Jesus.”- The earthly life of Jesus Christ
“And behold, you conceived in your womb and gave birth to a Son, and you called His name Jesus.”- Gospel.

Again we are convinced that the “source of truth” is as compressed as possible, because he needs to somehow be able to convey to us several thousand “highly artistic miniatures”, a chronology of palace intrigues and coups of various centuries, pagan tales from Troy, the “Jewish War” by Josephus and much, much more. another very important thing for an Orthodox Christian and raising Orthodox children. Therefore, “give birth to a Son” can be omitted and the Child can be named from the moment of conception.

“...and the Lord God will give him the throne of David your father» - The earthly life of Jesus Christ
“And the Lord God will give him the throne of David, His father" - Gospel
The Society of Ancient Letters distributes both of these books.

Read on.
Chapter “On the Annunciation.” Finally. Now we will touch upon the great moment of the beginning of our salvation and read a wonderful passage from the Gospel. “In the year 5499 and in the 36th year of the reign of Augustus, the month of Dustra, on the 25th day, on Sunday, at the ninth hour of the day, the Most Holy Theotokos prayed, and at that hour the Archangel Gabriel was sent to her by God in the city of Nazareth, and told her everything secret about the Only Begotten Son of God, as stated in the Gospel (as stated in the Gospel... “and so on” in short - A.K.). And no one from Joseph’s household knew what had happened, and the Mother of God did not tell anyone, not Joseph himself, until she saw her Son ascending to Heaven. That is why the Evangelist Matthew says: “And without understanding, she gave birth to her firstborn Son,” that is, they did not know the mystery of God in her, nor the hidden depths about her, nor what had happened.”

The last two sentences are such nonsense that you can grab your head. The first tells us that the Mother of God hid the moment of the great Annunciation from everyone until the moment of the Ascension of the Lord. I thought about the second sentence for a long time and remembered where the Apostle Matthew wrote this. I didn’t guess right away, because the fragment didn’t make sense at all. We open the Gospel and compare.

“And without understanding, she gave birth to her firstborn son.”- Z.M.I.H.
“And he accepted his wife. And without knowing Her, she gave birth to her Firstborn Son.”- Elisavetgrad Gospel. (small digression from the topic. I personally would really like to check the phrase « And without knowing Her dondezhe" and the presence of a word "Firstborn" in the Gospels not distributed by OLDP and older than their variants).

So, a complete inconsistency. Semantic dissonance, stupor. If we accept that there is a lie in the Gospel, or that something was written out of topic, then we get “no one understood that (the great moment of the Annunciation), until the Mother of God gave birth to her firstborn.” But wait. Isn’t it said on the line above: “and the Mother of God did not tell anyone, not Joseph himself, until she saw her Son ascending into Heaven”? It turns out that the second line immediately contradicts the first. The circle is closed. The Elisavetgrad Gospel contains a line that in no way corresponds to the meaning of Z.M.I.H., Z.M.I.H. contradicts itself. A complete dead end for the OLDP. They distribute both of these books.

The further story about the great moment of the Annunciation of the Most Holy Theotokos leads to the idea that this was written either by a completely insane person (then it is unclear how he was allowed to do such an important matter), or by an outright enemy. Let's read.

“And the Virgin Holy Mary said to the Angel: “What will happen to me, since I don’t know my husband?” As they said before, there is another certain meaning - so as not to return to what was said earlier - in what it means “I don’t know a husband,” that is: “I don’t desire, I have no attraction to my husband, I don’t know carnal lust.” For the virginity of the Mother of God was not due to abstinence or because of feats, like female adornment, and not because of diligence in chastity, but the virginity of the Mother of God was “It’s pretty much from nature, which all wives have, and human nature is strange.” It was said by the prophet Ezekiel (a book that is not in the “Biblical History” OLDP - A.K.): “The gate to the east will be closed, and no one can pass through except the Lord God of Israel: He alone will go in and out , and the gate will be shut." And all the prophets and apostles testify, and our fathers testify, and the bright teachers of the Catholic and Apostolic Church also agree.

That is why the great Dionysius the Areopagite said about Christ that He “The work of man is greater than man, and the Maiden of the Nativity, who is without sickness, listens.”(why is this?! - A.K.) Athanasius of Alexandria and Leo of Rome said about the Mother of God that she “The desires of a man are not known.” All holy Orthodox councils also testify to this. And Jacob the Jew (who is this? - A.K.), who lived then, wrote about her like this: “That He might be born into the land before all, and be touched by a woman, and be found a Virgin, just as before the Nativity of the Virgin.” Reuben the priest (Old Testament Reuben? - A.K.) also testifies : “I have received a message from the woman”(?! - A.K). And learning some other very nice things,(?! - A.K) said: “It’s a fair amount of nature to find.”(?! - A.K) And others echoed: “Nature was faster than the statute.”(?! - A.K)

I am 36 years old. From the teachings of the Church, I know that the Most Holy Theotokos was a Virgin before Christmas and remained a Virgin after Christmas. All blasphemous opinions of heretics have long been anathematized and they have long been burning in hell for their blasphemy against the Mother of God and God. This information is enough for me. Children need even less.

Tell me, why for the second time in this thin book with the loud title “The Earthly Life of Our Lord Jesus Christ” raise the topic of the virginity of the Most Holy Theotokos? And with obvious signs of savoring. Why is this? This topic is intimate and even just an ordinary girl, even if she has lived chastely all her life, will be embarrassed if someone even talks about it with praise. Here we are told about the Most Holy Theotokos and the great event of her Annunciation and the Incarnation of the Savior. Instead of telling us about the Great Sacrament as reverently and with sacred awe as possible, we are given incoherent blasphemous nonsense, which even if you read it 100 times, you won’t understand, while relishing the intimate topic of virginity. With references to Dionysius the Areopagite, whose quotation, of course, needs to be checked and which is not clear in what way it approaches this topic. With reference to some Jacob the Jew, who lived then. Who is this? Apostle James? Well, why wasn't he called that then? With reference to Reuben with his stupefying “testimony”? And only an eyewitness can testify. Who are we talking about?

- but the virginity of the Mother of God was “It’s pretty much natural, what all wives have, and human nature is strange”;
- “That He might be changed into the land, and be born before all, and be touched by a woman, and be found a Virgin, just as before the Nativity of the Virgin”;
- “I have received a message from the woman”;
- “It’s a fair amount of nature to gain”;
- “Nature was faster than the statute.”
This is what we are advised to teach our children...

It will be interesting to consider a miniature of the moment of the Annunciation. The Blessed Virgin Mary is depicted as an elderly, sad woman, although again in the same book, in the description of the life of the Roman kings, we can see miniatures with young smiling girls. It is interesting to pay attention to the strange blessing of the Angel.

Further. Page 145. “And three months passed, and Mary went to Galilee, to the house of Joseph, and was meek in word and disposition, and holy in image. The time has come, and her belly has grown. And immediately Joseph, seeing the saint and not knowing what the sacraments were about Her, became sad (in the original “she fell into labor” - A.K.), and planned kick out(in the original “expel” - A.K.) Secretly from her house.”
We open the Elisavetgrad Gospel. From Matthew. “Joseph is her righteous husband, and even though you denounce her, you don’t want to let her go.”

OLDP distributes both of these books. And it is very strange that in this blasphemous book with a loud title it is not written like this: “And immediately Joseph, seeing this outrage, wanted to grab this adulteress by the hair, take her out of the city and stone her.” Z.M.I.H presents Joseph as an indignant husband who, for unknown reasons, SECRETLY - just wanted to KICK OUT. The Gospel tells us about a meek and humble man who, having learned about the secret pregnancy of his wife (i.e., in his opinion, the accomplished fact of adultery), did not want to expose Her, but simply wanted to secretly let Her go.

Here's a very interesting place from a book for raising children.
Page 149-150. About the Magi.

In the year 5502, Herod, the governor, that is, the king of Judea, began to find out that a little time had passed since the Nativity of Christ, and the wise men came from Persia to the land of Judea, as envoys from the southeast, on the left side of Jerusalem, for Persia borders there with Judea. “The star did not appear like other stars, but it was not above the earth according to custom, as it was not according to custom that we walked and were at some insistence, but never appeared,” said the Great Basil. And John Chrysostom says: “Where the Birth of Jesus was pure and unspeakable, not in a den or in any temple, anything new, but Jesus as a young Child, as Matthew the Evangelist himself testifies. Very often there will be an appearance: Joseph and the All-Immaculate Maiden and from her Who was born without a seed, when from the strange and strange magicians we will hear the fear of God, Who was, and for what reason, and who created the descent to man, not only these, but the whole Jerusalem, and those who ruled all the Jews.”

How can you teach children something that adults cannot understand? And it is doubtful that these are even the words of Saints Basil and John, because when reading their teachings, you are amazed at the simplicity and depth of their thoughts and words. And here?

Let's check. Elisavetgrad Gospel, from Luke: “Then receive Him in your hand and bless God and say...” Again a discrepancy. Well, okay, we have already seen more than once that LLS does not correspond to the Gospel. Something else is more important now. Again and again we are given a snippet instead of a full story.

“Now you are releasing Your servant, O Master, according to Your word in peace, because my eyes have seen Your salvation, which You have prepared before the face of all people. A light for the revelation of the tongue and the glory of Your people Israel.” “This one is destined for the fall and rebellion of many.” Great moment, great words. But no. There is no place for them in the “source of truth.” Not a word at all about Anna the prophetess.

Page 153. “... and they bring gifts to Him, as to a great king and conqueror, and “they brought gold, and frankincense, and myrrh”: gold as for a king, incense as for a saint, and myrrh as for a dead man.” Why didn't they cut off the hands of the person who wrote this? How could one write such things about the Savior?

The words of John Chrysostom: “But what made the Magi bow when neither the Virgin was famous, nor her house was magnificent, and in all appearance there was nothing that could amaze and attract them?

Meanwhile, they not only worship, but also, having opened their treasures, bring gifts, and gifts not as to man, but as to God - because frankincense and myrrh were symbols of such worship. So, what prompted and forced them to leave the house and decide on such a long journey? The star and divine illumination of their thoughts little by little raised them to the most perfect vision. Otherwise, they would not have shown Him such honor under such seemingly unimportant circumstances. There was nothing great there for the senses, there was only a manger, a hut and a poor Mother, so that you could openly see the wisdom of the Magi and know that they did not approach to the common man, but as to God and benefactor.

That is why they were not tempted by anything visible or external, but worshiped and brought gifts, not similar to the coarse (offerings) of the Jews; They did not sacrifice sheep and calves, but, as if they were true Christians, brought Him knowledge, obedience and love."(John Chrysostom, interpretation of the Gospel of Matthew, conversation 8).

Page 156. “Joseph entered the sanctuary of the Egyptian god Avdul, and immediately all the idols fell down. The priests saw and were afraid, and bowed to the Savior so that the church would not fall on them. And they wanted to paint an icon with His image. The icon painter undertook to paint, but could not finish the image of Christ. They began to pray to the Savior to command everything and that His icon would be completed. Christ bowed down to her, and the icon itself was immediately completed. The Egyptians still keep this icon. Many strong kings wanted to take it, or make a copy of it, but they could not.”

An outright lie. Not a single Gospel tells about this. None of the teachers of the Church speak. " The Egyptians still keep this icon.” What is the name of the icon and where is it stored, if the author of these lines knows about it? “Many strong kings wanted to take it, or make a copy of it, but they could not.” What are the “many kings”? How did they want to take this icon? Military campaigns or peaceful requests? Why couldn’t they take it or at least just make a list? In this case, would there have been an iconoclastic period in the history of the Church if all this were true and known to everyone?

Page 162. “Likewise, Daniel testifies and says: “And he knows, and understands, speaking from the going out of the Word, let him answer, that he may build Jerusalem even unto the Lord Christ.” weeks of seven, 62". For 60 and two weeks give 483 years, and the beginning is received from the good Lords...”

First. We open Biblical History (the first four books of LLS), the appearance of the Archangel Gabriel to the Prophet Daniel. We read: weeks seven. Second. We multiply 60 by 7 and add 14 (7+7) We get 434. The compilers of the “source of truth” forgot to add another 49 (7*7) from the vision of the prophet. Anyway. If the “source of truth” does not care about consistency with the Gospel and the Old Testament, then can he be strongly criticized for spelling and arithmetic inaccuracies?

The further into the forest, the more firewood.
Page 170-171. This same Augustus Caesar Octavian, in the 55th year of his reign, in the month of October, which is called in Macedonian Uperveretius, went to a fortune teller called the Pythia, and solemnly made a sacrifice, and asked: “Who will reign after me in the city of Rome?” And the Pythia did not give him an answer. And again he made another sacrifice and asked the Pythia: “Why was no answer given to me, but magic is silent?” And the Pythia told him this: “The Jewish youth commands me, by the command of the Good God, to leave this house and go to hell. Therefore, get out of our houses.”

Young Jew(rejoice, neo-pagans! the “source of truth” confirms your crookedness) by command good(precisely good) God commands the witch to go to hell. No comments.

Page 171. “And Augustus Caesar left the fortune-teller and came to the Capitol, and built there a large and tall altar, on which he wrote in Roman letters: “This altar of God’s great-grandfather”; this altar is in the Capitol even now, as Timothy wrote.”

If this, again, is not the ravings of a madman, which is very similar, it would be nice for the author to refer to a source telling about which Timofey wrote and where about the “altar of God’s great-grandfather.” And what kind of nonsense is this anyway - “the altar of God’s great-grandfather”? And why is this included in the book telling about the Savior? Let's assume that they draw a parallel with the Act of the Holy Apostles. Open it and read it. In the absence of an “Apostle” from the OLDP (they do not distribute it at all and refuse to answer questions regarding the Acts, the Epistles of the Saints, as well as the Apocalypse of John the Theologian), we take the synodal text. The altar is called "unknown god"(Acts 17:23). Absolute discrepancy. Let the OLDP, who distributes this book, answer this question for us. Maybe in their version of the Apostle the altar is stupidly called “to the great-grandfather of God”? Or is this a completely different topic? The word is up to them.

Page 174. “This Tiberius Caesar was at first meek and generous. When he made someone a ruler or a military leader, he did not change him for a long time. When he was asked about this, he told a parable: “One man had purulent sores all over his legs. And the flies came and ate these sores, but he did not drive them away. And someone wanted to drive away the flies, but he exclaimed: “Man, leave it, for these flies have eaten my rotting parts and now they sadden me little. When others come, hungry, they will bring me more suffering." It was he who said about the authorities that they should not be changed often, so that those in power have time to get enough of it and do not oppress their subordinates so much.”

Oh, the wisdom of the Roman pagan kings. I bet that it is for this paragraph that golden rain will fall on LLS. In general, again, an interesting story for raising children. I imagine gray balls moving in naive and simple children's heads: an uncle with sore legs that fester and hurt, instead of going to the doctor and healing them, he just sits and patiently watches as flies eat his ulcers. Despite the fact that my mother said that flies spread infection. That you need to drive them out of the house. Do not allow food to sit on.

Page 180. “About the baptism of our Lord Jesus Christ and about John the Baptist.
In the year five thousand five hundred and thirty, in the 15th year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, the archangel Gabriel appeared to John, the son of Zechariah, in the desert and said to him: “Thus says the Lord, who created you and chose you from your mother’s womb: go to a habitable place.” and baptize all that come to repentance, and behold, I will send My only begotten Son; He will come and be baptized by you, and he will sanctify the waters and all those who are baptized; over Him you will see the Spirit of God descending in the vision of a dove and remaining on Him, He is My beloved Son, Judge of the living and the dead, delivering the faithful from all wrath.” Having heard this, the Forerunner of the Lord John came to Jerusalem, and the Jews came, “and was baptized by him, confessing their sins.”

Elisavetgrad Gospel, from Luke . “In the fifth and tenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar […] the word of God came to John Zechariah’s son in the wilderness. And he came to the whole country of Jordan preaching baptism of repentance for the remission of sins.”

Life of John the Baptist. “In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius, when John was 30 years old, there was a voice of God to him, commanded to leave the desert and go to the Jewish people and by preaching repentance and baptism to awaken the people to repentance of their sins: for the time has come for the coming of the Messiah.”

As we see, neither the Gospel nor the life of John the Baptist tells us about the appearance of the Archangel Gabriel to him. And the “country of Jordan” is not the city of Jerusalem. Totally lies.

Page 181-182. “They said then that one of the Jews walked around in strange clothes, having attached animal skins (“cattle hair” in the original - A.K.) to his body in those places where his hair was not covered, and his face was like a wild one. […] His mouth did not know bread; even on Easter he did not taste unleavened bread, saying: “This food was given in remembrance of God, who freed people from work.” He didn’t allow any other intoxicating wine even close to him. And he did not accept any animal food. He exposed every lie. And he ate honey from wild bees and chips from trees, that is, shoots.”

Z.M.I.H. - a complete constant lie. Two evangelists - Matthew and Mark, Saint John Chrysostom tell that John the Baptist was not hairy like a beast (as Z.M.I.H. tells and shows in miniatures), but wore clothes made of camel skins. And he ate not wild honey with chips and branches, but wild honey and locusts (locusts). In order not to burden the article, I will not cite excerpts. Everyone can see this for themselves.

Someone might say: why bother so much? There may be minor inaccuracies everywhere. I want to convey that these are not minor inaccuracies and errors. And this short article has already provided enough facts for an objective person. This is purposeful lies and blasphemy.

In general, the entire description of the life of John the Baptist from this book is a vast field of activity for research. Here you can discuss his every statement, his every action.

For the first time, the legendary Front Chronicle of Tsar Ivan the Terrible has appeared in open and free access on the website of the OLDP (Society of Lovers of Ancient Writing). The manuscript with hundreds of colorful miniatures can be downloaded from the links below.

The facial chronicle was created in the 16th century by order of the Russian Tsar Ivan the Terrible for the education of the royal children. The work on compiling this Code was headed by the most educated man of his time - St. Macarius, Metropolitan of Moscow and All Rus'. The best scribes and icon painters of the capital worked on compiling the Code. What they performed: a collection of all reliably known sources from Holy Scripture(text of the Septuagint) to the history of Alexander the Great and the writings of Josephus - the entire written history of mankind from the creation of the world to the 16th century inclusive. All times and all peoples who had writing are reflected in dozens of books in this collection. No human civilization has created such a chronicle collection, decorated with a huge number of highly artistic illustrations: neither Europe, nor Asia, nor America or Africa. The fate of the Russian Tsar himself and his children was tragic. The facial chronicle was of no use to the princes. After reading the Facial Vault, part of which is dedicated to the period of Ivan the Terrible, it becomes clear why. Over the next hundreds of years, official historiography appeared, often opportunistic and politically biased, and therefore reliable chronicle sources were doomed to destruction or correction, that is, falsification. The facial chronicle corpus survived these centuries due to the fact that after the death of Ivan the Terrible, during a period of unrest and timelessness, this tome became a coveted object for “enlightened” bibliophiles. Its fragments were stolen from their libraries by the most influential nobles of their time: Osterman, Sheremetev, Golitsyn and others. After all, even then, high-ranking collectors understood that such a tome with sixteen thousand miniatures had no price. So the Code survived until the revolution and was dumped in heaps in several museums and storage facilities.

Already today, through the efforts of enthusiasts, scattered books and sheets have been collected together from various repositories. And the revived Society of Lovers of Ancient Writing has made this masterpiece accessible to everyone. A historical source that has no analogues, many major educational establishments world, national libraries different countries and, of course, our compatriots for raising children on this treasure of experience and wisdom of millennia. In such an amazing way, the work that was done for the royal children five hundred years ago went to our children, dear contemporaries, for which we congratulate you with all our hearts!

First volume

Part 1 -