home / Health/ Did Hitler want to destroy the Slavs? The last words heard from Hitler's lips.

Did Hitler want to destroy the Slavs? The last words heard from Hitler's lips.

RESULTS OF THE EXAMINATION OF THE BOOK MY STRUGGLE The reason for this examination was the widespread opinion about the anti-Russian orientation of A. Hitler’s main work “My Struggle”. To test this thesis, I conducted a contextual analysis of the electronic version of “My Struggle” using the search command for the words “Russian”, “Russia”. All the places where these words appear and where these concepts are discussed are given below.
V.Popov

From Chapter V. The Russian-Japanese War found me already a more mature person. I followed these events even more closely. In this war, I took a certain side and, moreover, for national reasons. In discussions related to the Russo-Japanese War, I immediately took the side of the Japanese. In the defeat of Russia, I also began to see the defeat of the Austrian Slavs. (Since Hitler had Austrian citizenship, his negative attitude towards the Austrian Slavs is quite understandable - Russia used pan-Slavic propaganda to disintegrate the Austro-Hungarian army, which had its indirect confirmation in the successes of the Russian army against it - editor's note)

From Chapter VI. ...We all know that the French Revolution was by no means the result of philosophical theories. This revolution would not have happened if the demagogues of the grand style had not created a whole army of people who poisoned the monarchy, systematically inflaming the passions of the suffering people - until finally a monstrous explosion erupted, making all of Europe tremble. The same can be said about the biggest revolutionary upheaval of modern times. It was not Lenin's writings that made the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. The main role was played by the oratory activities of large and small apostles of hatred, who inflamed the passions of the people to incredible proportions.

The people, consisting of illiterate people, were drawn into the communist revolution not by reading the theoretical works of Karl Marx, but by the pictures of those heavenly blessings that thousands and thousands of agitators painted for them, guided, of course, by only one specific idea. That's how it was, that's how it always will be. (Here we mean, of course, the Russian-language Jewish press, as well as the army of socialist propagandists - editor's note)

From Chapter IX. The population of Russia was completely illiterate, which, of course, could not be said about Germany or other Western European nations. In Russia the intelligentsia itself for the most part belongs to non-Russian nationalities and, in any case, to non-Slavic races. It was easy to deal with the thin layer of the intelligentsia in Russia, because between it and the broad masses of the people there were almost no intermediate links, and the mental and moral level of the broad masses of the people in Russia was terribly low.

(A good third of all Russian noble families are of Turkic, Tatar origin. So, for example, Aksakov - in Turkic “lame”, Gogol - “drake”, Bulgakov - from the Tatar “proud man”, Karamzin - “black prince”, Kutuzov - from the Turkic “ mad", Turgenev - from the Tatar "turgen", i.e. "fast", "quick", Chaadaev - on behalf of the second son of Genghis Khan - Chagatai, Ogarev - from the nickname of the Tatar prince Kutlamamet "ogar", "tall", Timiryazev - from the proper name “iron warrior”, Berdyaev - “berdi”, “he gave”, Saltykov - “sold”, etc. However, this is not a complete list of Tatar surnames that gave rise to “Russian” writers and scientists. - approx. ed.)

In Russia, little was enough. It was only necessary to incite the uneducated masses, who could neither read nor write, against the upper layer of the intelligentsia, which was already almost unconnected with the people. This was enough to decide the entire fate of the country and so that the revolution could be considered a success. The entire illiterate mass of the Russian people fell into complete slavery to the Jewish dictators, who, of course, had the intelligence to drape their dictatorship in the toga of the “dictatorship of the people.”

From Chapter XI. Having seized political power, the Jews believe that they can now finally throw off the mask. From the “people's Jew” hatches a bloody Jew - a Jew who has become a tyrant of nations. Within a short time, he tries to completely eradicate the intelligentsia, the bearer of the national idea. Having deprived the people of ideological leaders, he wants to finally turn them into slaves and enslave them forever.

From Chapter XIII. Jews already hold modern European states in their hands. They turn these states into their weak-willed instruments, using either the method of so-called Western democracy or the method of direct oppression in the form of Russian Bolshevism. (The method of Western democracy turned out to be effective only in non-Aryan state formations with authoritarian rule - kingdoms, kingdoms and empires. That is, where there was no traditional culture of local self-government - veche republics - editor's note)

From Chapter XIV. When we talk about the conquest of new lands in Europe, we, of course, can primarily mean only Russia and those peripheral states that are subordinate to it.

Fate itself points its finger at us. Having delivered Russia into the hands of Bolshevism, fate deprived the Russian people of that intelligentsia on which its state existence had hitherto rested and which alone served as a guarantee of a certain strength of the state. It was not the state talents of the Slavs that gave strength and strength to the Russian state. Russia owed all this to the Germanic elements - an excellent example of the enormous state role that Germanic elements are capable of playing when acting within a lower race. This is how many powerful states on earth were created. More than once in history we have seen how peoples of a lower culture, led by the Germans as organizers, turned into powerful states and then remained firmly on their feet while the racial core of the Germans remained. For centuries, Russia lived off the German core in its upper strata of the population. Now this core has been completely destroyed. Jews took the place of the Germans. But just as the Russians cannot throw off the yoke of the Jews on their own, so the Jews alone are not able to keep this huge state under their control for long. The Jews themselves are by no means an element of organization, but rather a ferment of disorganization. This giant eastern state is inevitably doomed to destruction. All the prerequisites for this have already matured. The end of Jewish rule in Russia will also be the end of Russia as a state. Fate has destined us to witness such a catastrophe, which, better than anything else, will unconditionally confirm the correctness of our racial theory.

(Hitler proceeds in his theories about the role of German elements in the creation of Russian statehood primarily from the official doctrine of Tsarist Russia about the Norman origin of Rurik and other Russian princes. Today, the “Norman theory” is criticized as unpatriotic and anti-Russian. But the fact is that the self-name of these the most Norman-Varangians were "Rus" and they spoke, accordingly, in Russian. Already during the Second World War, German scientists who were engaged in excavations in the Crimea on the territory of the former East Gothic Kingdom came to the conclusion that the Russian Cossacks are the descendants of those the most Goths, from whom all European nobility and the Gothic style in architecture originate.The famous Norwegian traveler and explorer Thor Heyerdahl, shortly before his death, carried out an archaeological expedition to the Northern Black Sea region and came to the conclusion that the Norwegians are a related people with the Goths, the ancestors of the Cossacks. - editor's note)

Russian Bolshevism is only a new, 20th-century attempt by Jews to achieve world domination. In other historical periods, the same desire of the Jews took on only a different form...

Let's not talk about the true intentions of the new rulers of Russia. It is enough for us that Russia, having lost its top German layer, has already ceased to have any significance as a possible ally of the German nation in the liberation struggle. From a purely military point of view, a war between Germany and Russia against Western Europe (or rather, in this case, against the rest of the world) would be a real disaster for us. After all, the whole struggle would have taken place not on Russian, but on German territory, and Germany could not even count on any serious support from Russia...

I do not forget all the brazen threats that pan-Slavist Russia dared to systematically shower on Germany. I do not forget the repeated trial mobilizations that Russia resorted to with the sole purpose of infringing on Germany. I cannot forget the sentiments that prevailed in Russia even before the war, and those fierce attacks on our people, which were carried out by the Russian big press, which was enthusiastic about France. (Most of the press at that time was already “Russian-language, that is, Jewish. Let us remember that during the American bombings in Yugoslavia, NTV and other Jewish media were the loudest inciting anti-American sentiments - editor's note)

However, just before the start of the war, we still had a second way: we could rely on Russia against England...

1. The modern rulers (Jewish - editor's note) of Russia do not at all think about concluding an honest alliance with Germany, much less about its implementation if they concluded it.

(It was because of this that Hitler decided to start a preventive war with the Jewish Soviet Union, which posed a mortal threat to Aryan Germany - ed.)

That's all that Hitler wrote about the Russians and about Russia in his bestseller "My Struggle." In terms of its total circulation, it took second place in the twentieth century after the Bible.

The overwhelming majority of our contemporaries are firmly convinced that the plans of “inhuman fascism” included the extermination of millions of Slavs. This belief is so strong that it has actually become an unquestionable truth. At the same time, there is no full-fledged evidence of the existence of such aspirations at the top of the National Socialist state.

The appearance of allegations about the Nazis' plans to exterminate the majority of the population of the European part of the USSR dates back to the time of the notorious Nuremberg trials. Of course, even before Nuremberg, that is, even during the war, the allied “information warfare aces” periodically repeated the idea that the “fascists” wanted to exterminate millions of people, but then it was just propaganda, often very clumsy.

The manipulators selected several “documents” as proof of the thesis about the liquidation of the Slavs. The main one is the so-called " General plan Ost". It is significant that the text of the plan has not yet been discovered. However, during the Nuremberg trial this “document” appeared, however, in the form of certain “Comments and proposals on the general plan of Ost.” The author of the notes was the head of one of the departments of the Ministry on affairs of the occupied eastern territories by E. Wetzel. Wetzel's notes in their entirety (they are pencil sketches in a note book) were never published. In their most complete form, they are presented in the Military Historical Journal (No. 1, 1960, pp. 87 -98)

1. General comments on the Ost master plan;
2. General remarks on the issue of Germanization;
3. Towards a solution to the Polish question;
4. On the question of future treatment of the Russian population.

In the first section, Wetzel addresses the issue of the resettlement of Germans in the eastern territories. Their number should be 4550 thousand people at first. "Racially undesirable local residents" should be resettled in Western Siberia. "5-6 million Jews are subject to liquidation even before the resettlement takes place." Wetzel further notes the need to take into account data on the racial composition of the peoples of the East.

In the second section, the official, or those who concocted this fake on his behalf, examines measures for the so-called “Germanization” (inclusion into the Reich’s orbit of “local residents of non-German origin who have characteristics of the Nordic race”). By the way, the famous Soviet pseudo-historians “Hitlerologists” D. Melnikov and L. Chernaya in their “works” propose to understand “Germanization” as physical destruction. That is, according to these talented Jewish publicists, the Nazis planned to destroy representatives of the Nordic race... An interesting discovery!

In the third section, Wetzel calls the Poles "the most dangerous people." At the same time, he notes that “the Polish question cannot be resolved by eliminating the Poles,” since “such a solution would forever burden the conscience of the German people and deprive us of everyone’s sympathy.”

The body of the document is replete with obvious factual errors. Thus, in the last section, Wetzel writes about the “imperial commissariat for Russian affairs” that never existed in nature. It is difficult to admit that this official was not familiar with the structure of his own ministry. Here he mentions the Gorky and Tula general commissariats, although Wetzel could not help but know that these territorial units were called districts in official papers (not even general districts, like Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Belarus).

There are a lot of “comments” and completely ridiculous proposals. Let's say Wetzel proposes to resettle some of the Poles "to South America, especially to Brazil." This is very reminiscent of the well-known “duck” about plans to place Jews on the island. Madagascar.

Therefore, the conclusion suggests itself that Wetzel's pencil sketches were either falsified from beginning to end (a very common practice of the Allies), or were subject to "some editing" by "experts." In any case, we are dealing with an extremely dubious document that does not stand up to serious testing for authenticity and, in an amicable way, should be struck off the list of reliable historical sources once and for all. By the way, many Western researchers did this a long time ago.

It is significant that even when working with such a controversial document, some historical historians manage to “reveal the monstrous secrets of fascism,” while showing miracles of unprofessionalism. The mentioned Melnikov and Chernaya, for example, in the book “Criminal No. 1” write: “In one place in the plan it is proposed, in particular, to resettle Russians in South America and Africa.” As we remember, Wetzel proposed sending some of the Poles, and not the Russians, to South America. There is not a word about Africa in the “remarks”. In addition, the leading “Hitlerologists” also showed themselves to be remarkable specialists in the field of philology, declaring that physical destruction should be understood not only by the word “Germanize,” but also by the words “deport” and “resettle.”

In attempts to find confirmation of the thesis about plans to exterminate the Slavs, Soviet propagandists did not hesitate to resort to the help of other, equally dubious sources. For example, in the collection “Criminal Goals - Criminal Means” the “Political Testament” of Private Gustav Hildebrandt was published. It is clear that the value of such a “major document” raises big questions.

Anti-fascist scholars eagerly quote the speeches of a number of German leaders. Reichsführer SS G. Himmler is especially popular. Thus, Chernaya in her book “Brown Dictators” writes that “on the eve of the attack on the Soviet Union, Himmler stated that one of the goals of the campaign in the East was the destruction of 30 million Slavs.” This statement is completely false. It was borrowed from a propaganda article by I. Ehrenburg during the war. By inventing messages of this kind, the Jewish writer fulfilled a social order, inciting bestial hatred of everything German, and calling for the physical destruction of German women and children.

Now let's ask ourselves how the leaders of Germany really treated the Slavs.

It's no secret that the ideology of National Socialism was based on racial theory. Many researchers try to deny the scientific value of the doctrine of races, that is their business. It is important that for the leaders of the Third Reich, issues of blood were of utmost importance. Hitler wrote: “Sins against blood and race are the most terrible sins in this world. A nation that indulges in these sins is doomed.”

In a number of monographs, sometimes very valuable from a factual point of view, the authors make the same mistake: the Nazis considered the Slavs to be “subhuman” and wanted to destroy them. For example, modern researcher Boris Kovalev, in his book about the Nazi occupation regime, notes: “After the Nazis came to power in Germany, eugenics, the “science” of racial hygiene, began to enjoy official support.” The goal of eugenics, according to the author, was “to determine the optimal number of “Untermensch”. The latter included Jews, Gypsies and Slavs.”

In order to refute this amateurish statement, let us turn to one of the leading racial theorists of Nazi Germany, Hans Günther. In his works, he clearly distinguishes between the concepts of people and race. Race, according to Gunther, “is a single group of people, distinguished from others by a special, inherent combination of physical characteristics and mental properties, which always reproduces only its own kind.”

The Germans, like any European people, consist of several races: “People of the same race, or, more correctly, the same racial mixture, can speak different languages, and peoples speaking the same language can differ from each other racially. But most importantly: "Peoples are always racial mixtures and never a race." The most “valuable,” according to Gunther, is the Nordic race. It is present in varying proportions in all European nations. The percentage of Nordic blood among the Great Russians is very significant and is generally higher than among the Germans themselves. This opinion was shared by other German racologists. Fritz Lenz noted back in 1915: “Racially, Muscovites are closer to the Germans.”

It is clear that racology in Germany was not at all some kind of abstract scientific discipline. The leaders of the party and state listened sensitively to its conclusions and recommendations. The scientific calculations of racologists were actively used in legislation. One of the most important laws of the Reich is the “Law on the Citizenship of the Empire and the Protection of German Blood and German Honor” of September 15, 1935. Let us quote an excerpt from this document: “German blood does not form its own race. The German people consists of representatives of different races. But all these races have the characteristic that their blood is mutually compatible and the mixture of these bloods, unlike blood that is not related to them, does not create obstacles and tensions. One can, without a doubt, equate to German blood the blood of those peoples whose racial composition is related to the German people. This applies to all peoples inhabiting the spaces of Europe. Blood related to German is considered equally in all directions. Therefore, citizens of the Empire may become representatives of minorities living in Germany, for example, Poles, Danes, etc."

Thus, the Slavic peoples, and, of course, the Russian people were officially recognized in the Reich as racially related, fraternal ethnic groups. What is the point of destroying your brothers - this is the simplest question that we address to Kovalev, Chernaya and other conscious and unconscious falsifiers of history.

Our conclusions are also confirmed by historical facts. The Slavic states - Bulgaria, Croatia, Slovakia - were loyal and staunch allies of the New Europe, taking part in the crusade against Bolshevism. Croatia and Slovakia, by the way, owed their independence to Hitler personally. Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Bulgarians, Czechs, and Poles fought against communism in the ranks of the Wehrmacht and SS troops.

Why did Dr. Goebbels sincerely admire the bravery of the soldiers of the Russian Liberation Army? Why did Alfred Rosenberg write that “Russia is a country that has preserved the true image of Christ in its breast”? Why did Adolf Hitler donate hundreds of thousands of Reichsmarks for the construction of the Berlin Orthodox Cathedral and for the renovation of dozens of Russian churches, and called the Russians a “GREAT PEOPLE”? Very simple. Because the National Socialists never wanted to destroy the Slavs!

Dmitry Demushkin

Sources:

Someone I knew recently asked, what exactly did Hitler say about Russia and Russians? (Many of my friends and colleagues, who are far from the Movement and ideas of National Socialism, for some reason consider me a great expert in Hitler’s works, which I, of course, am not). And since, although I read My Struggle several times, it was quite a long time ago, so I had to look for it again. But before doing it myself, I decided to check Google for ready-made research. It’s clear - I found it, and closer than I could have imagined. I publish with the supposed permission of the author, with full quotation acknowledgment.

RESULTS OF THE EXAMINATION OF THE BOOK "MY STRUGGLE" via popovvlad

“The reason for this examination was the widespread opinion about the anti-Russian orientation of A. Hitler’s main work “My Struggle”. To verify this thesis, I conducted a contextual analysis of the electronic version of “My Struggle” using the search command for the words “Russian”, “Russia” All places where these words are found and where these concepts are discussed are given below. V. Popov

From Chapter V. The Russo-Japanese War found me a more mature person. I followed these events even more closely. In this war, I took a certain side and, moreover, for national reasons. In discussions related to the Russo-Japanese War, I immediately took the side of the Japanese. In the defeat of Russia, I also began to see the defeat of the Austrian Slavs. (Since Hitler had Austrian citizenship, his negative attitude towards the Austrian Slavs is quite understandable - Russia used pan-Slavic propaganda to disintegrate the Austro-Hungarian army, which had its indirect confirmation in the successes of the Russian army against it - editor's note)

From Chapter VI....We all know that the French Revolution was by no means the result of philosophical theories. This revolution would not have happened if the demagogues of the grand style had not created a whole army of people who poisoned the monarchy, systematically inflaming the passions of the suffering people - until finally a monstrous explosion erupted, making all of Europe tremble. The same can be said about the biggest revolutionary upheaval of modern times. It was not Lenin's writings that made the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. The main role was played by the oratory activities of large and small apostles of hatred, who inflamed the passions of the people to incredible proportions.

From Chapter IX. The population of Russia was completely illiterate, which, of course, could not be said about Germany or other Western European nations. In Russia the intelligentsia itself for the most part belongs to non-Russian nationalities and, in any case, to non-Slavic races. It was easy to deal with the thin layer of the intelligentsia in Russia, because between it and the broad masses of the people there were almost no intermediate links, and the mental and moral level of the broad masses of the people in Russia was terribly low.

From Chapter XI. Having seized political power, the Jews believe that they can now finally throw off the mask. From the “people's Jew” hatches a bloody Jew - a Jew who has become a tyrant of nations. Within a short time, he tries to completely eradicate the intelligentsia, the bearer of the national idea. Having deprived the people of ideological leaders, he wants to finally turn them into slaves and enslave them forever.

From Chapter XIII. Jews already hold modern European states in their hands. They turn these states into their weak-willed instruments, using either the method of so-called Western democracy or the method of direct oppression in the form of Russian Bolshevism. (The method of Western democracy turned out to be effective only in non-Aryan state formations with authoritarian rule - kingdoms, kingdoms and empires. That is, where there was no traditional culture of local self-government - veche republics - editor's note)

From Chapter XIV. When we talk about the conquest of new lands in Europe, we, of course, can primarily mean only Russia and those peripheral states that are subordinate to it.

Russian Bolshevism is only a new, 20th-century attempt by Jews to achieve world domination. In other historical periods, the same desire of the Jews took on only a different form...

However, just before the start of the war, we still had a second way: we could rely on Russia against England...

1. The modern rulers (Jewish - editor's note) of Russia do not at all think about concluding an honest alliance with Germany, much less about its implementation if they concluded it.

(It was because of this that Hitler decided to start a preventive war with the Jewish Soviet Union, which posed a mortal threat to Aryan Germany - ed.)

That's all that Hitler wrote about the Russians and about Russia in his bestseller "My Struggle." In terms of its total circulation, it took second place in the twentieth century after the Bible.".

"Hitler first expressed his intention to defeat the USSR out loud at the end of May 1940.
True, at that moment, these were just thoughts."

Apparently, the author of this opinion either did not read Mein Kampf (volume 1 was published on July 18, 1925) or believes that it is necessary to speak to Adolf Hitler so that Adolf Hitler’s opinion is known. And reading the book “Mein Kampf” published several times before 1940 is not important. Or is it important d_prospero that it is “USSR” that is written/said. Next, excerpts from the book. In connection with possible questions about the legality of quotation - in the country where I am posting, the book is not banned

If residents of the Russian Federation read, I’ll immediately emphasize that no intentions propaganda of Nazism when quoting.
"...If we take only the size of the territories, then the German state has a ridiculously small importance compared to the so-called world powers. And let them not tell us that England is also a small territory! In fact, England is only the capital of the British world empire, and this latter embraces almost a quarter of the entire earth's surface.Look further at such gigantic states as the United States of North America, then Russia and China. Each of these states owns a territory at least 10 times larger than modern Germany. Even France now has to be included among these huge states. It is increasingly drawing new human material for its armies from the African colonies. Racially, France is now undergoing such strong Negro influences that soon it will be possible to talk about the emergence of a new African state on European territory. The colonial policy of modern France cannot be compared at all with the colonial policy that Germany once pursued. If France continues to develop in the same direction for another three centuries, the last remnants of Frankish blood will disappear, dissolving into a new European-African mulatto state. France is gradually turning into one gigantic state, stretching from the Rhine to the Congo. And in this state a lower race is gradually spreading, which is the product of an ever-increasing mixing of blood.

This is what distinguishes French colonial policy from the old German colonial policy....
...When we talk about the conquest of new lands in Europe, we, of course, can mean first of all only Russia and those peripheral states that are subordinate to it.
....
Fate itself points its finger at us. Having betrayed Russia into the hands of Bolshevism, fate deprived the Russian people of that intelligentsia, on which its state existence has hitherto rested and which alone has served as a guarantee of a certain strength of the state. It was not the state talents of the Slavs that gave strength and strength to the Russian state. Russia owed all this to the Germanic elements - an excellent example of the enormous state role that Germanic elements are capable of playing when acting within a lower race. This is how many powerful states on earth were created. More than once in history we have seen how peoples of a lower culture, led by the Germans as organizers, turned into powerful states and then remained firmly on their feet while the racial core of the Germans remained. For centuries, Russia lived off the German core in its upper strata of the population. Now this core has been completely destroyed. Jews took the place of the Germans. But just as the Russians cannot throw off the yoke of the Jews on their own, so the Jews alone are not able to keep this huge state under their control for long. The Jews themselves are by no means an element of organization, but rather a ferment of disorganization. This giant eastern state is inevitably doomed to destruction. All the prerequisites for this have already matured. The end of Jewish rule in Russia will also be the end of Russia as a state. Fate has destined us to witness such a catastrophe, which, better than anything else, will unconditionally confirm the correctness of our racial theory...
It would indeed be foolish to expect that one or another coalition, consisting only of cripples, could ever succeed in overthrowing the most powerful state, determined to fight for its dominion, if necessary, to the last drop of blood. I myself belong to the völkische camp, but that is why I know what a huge role race plays, and for this alone I do not believe that these so-called “oppressed nations”, belonging to lower races, could overcome England. For this reason alone, I do not want my people to unite their destinies with the destinies of the “oppressed nations.”

We must now take the same position in relation to Russia. Let's not talk about the true intentions of the new rulers of Russia. It is enough for us that Russia, having lost its top German layer, has already ceased to have any significance as a possible ally of the German nation in the liberation struggle.
....and, they will tell us, we cannot repeat such a policy, “because modern Italy is not the Italy of the Bismarck era.” Right! But, dear gentlemen, let me remind you then of the fact that modern Russia is also no longer the same as Russia was in the era of Bismarck! It never even occurred to Bismarck to immortalize this or that tactical move for all time... Well, there is absolutely no need to talk about Russia as a serious technical factor in the war. We could not oppose almost anything to the general motorization of the world, which will play a colossal and decisive role in the next war. Germany itself is shamefully lagging behind in this important area. But in the event of such a war, it would still have to support Russia from its little, because Russia does not yet have a single factory of its own that could actually make, say, a real living truck.....
I do not forget all the brazen threats that pan-Slavist Russia dared to systematically shower on Germany. I do not forget the repeated trial mobilizations that Russia resorted to with the sole purpose of infringing on Germany. I cannot forget the sentiments that prevailed in Russia even before the war, and those fierce attacks on our people, which were carried out by the Russian big press, which was enthusiastic about France.

However, just before the start of the war, we still had a second way: we could rely on Russia against England.

Now the situation has changed radically. If before the World War we could suppress our feelings of resentment against Russia and still go with it against England, now this is out of the question. The hand on the dial of history has moved much further. The hour is approaching when the fate of our people must, one way or another, finally be resolved. All large states of the earth are now experiencing a process of consolidation. ...

Did Hitler want to destroy the Slavs?

The overwhelming majority of our contemporaries are firmly convinced that
the plans of “inhuman fascism” included the destruction of millions of Slavs. This
belief is so strong that it has actually turned into an inappropriate
doubt the truth. At the same time, there is no full evidence of the existence
similar aspirations at the top of the National Socialist state
does not exist.

The emergence of allegations of plans by the Nazis to exterminate the majority

the population of the European part of the USSR has a sad attitude towards the times
the famous Nuremberg trials. Of course, even before Nuremberg, that is,
during the war, the allied “information warfare aces” periodically
repeated the idea of the desire of the “fascists” to exterminate millions of people, but
then it was just propaganda, often very clumsy.

As proof of the thesis about the liquidation of the Slavs, the manipulators chose
several "documents". The main one is the so-called
"General plan Ost". It is significant that the text of the plan is still not
discovered. However, during the Nuremberg trial this “document”
appeared, however, in the form of some “Comments and suggestions on
master plan Ost". The author of the notes was the head of one of
departments of the Ministry for the Occupied Eastern Territories of E.
Wetzel. Wetzel's notes in their entirety (they are pencil
sketches in a notebook) were never published. In the most
they are presented in full in the Military Historical Journal (No. 1, 1960,
ss. 87-98)

1. General comments on the Ost master plan;

2. General comments on the issue of Germanization;

Interesting discovery!

Jews on the island Madagascar.

many Western researchers.

women and children.

Germany to the Slavs.

Muscovites are closer to the Germans."

falsifiers of history.

And the last from Hitler's will!

"If the war is lost, the German people should not exist. There is nothing
to ensure that this people survives its defeat. Destroy
all factories, bridges, food. This people turned out to be weak, and,
This means that the future belongs to the people of Russia, who have shown themselves to be more
strong"

3. Towards the solution of the Polish question;

4. On the question of future treatment of the Russian population.

In the first section, Wetzel addresses the issue of resettlement of Germans to
eastern territories. Their number should be 4550 thousand people per
first time. "Racially undesirable locals" should
be resettled to Western Siberia. "5-6 million Jews are subject to
liquidation even before resettlement." Wetzel further notes
the need to take into account data on the racial composition of the peoples of the East.

In the second section, the official examines the activities of the so-called
"Germanization" (inclusion into the Reich's orbit of "local residents of non-German
origin, which have characteristics of the Nordic race"). By the way,
famous Soviet pseudo-historians "Hitlerologists" D. Melnikov and L. Chernaya
in their “works” they propose to understand by “Germanization” physical
destruction. That is, according to these talented Jewish publicists,
The Nazis planned to exterminate representatives of the Nordic race...
Interesting discovery!

In the third section, Wetzel calls the Poles "the most dangerous people."
At the same time, he notes that “the Polish question cannot be resolved by
liquidation of the Poles", since "such a decision would burden the eternal
times the conscience of the German people and would deprive us of everyone's sympathy."

The body of the document is replete with obvious factual errors. Yes, in the last
section Wetzel writes about the “imperial” that never existed in nature
Commissariat for Russian Affairs". It is difficult to admit that this official did not
was familiar with the structure of his own ministry. Here he is
mentions the Gorky and Tula general commissariats, although
Wetzel could not help but know that these territorial units were called
official papers by districts (not even general districts, like Lithuania,
Latvia, Estonia and Belarus).

There are a lot of “comments” and completely ridiculous proposals. Let's say Wetzel
proposes to resettle some of the Poles "to South America, especially to
Brazil". This is very reminiscent of the famous "canard" about placement plans
Jews on the island Madagascar.

Therefore, the conclusion suggests itself that Wetzel’s pencil sketches were either
falsified from start to finish (and this is a very common
practice of the Allies), or were subject to “some editing” by
"specialists". In any case, we are dealing with an extremely dubious
a document that does not stand up to serious scrutiny for
authenticity and, in an amicable way, should be erased from
list of reliable historical sources. By the way, this was done a long time ago
many Western researchers.

It is significant that even when working with such a controversial document, some
history's tightrope walkers manage to "reveal monstrous secrets
fascism", while showing miracles of unprofessionalism. Mentioned
Melnikov and Chernaya, for example, in the book “Criminal No. 1” write: “In one
In place of the plan, it is proposed, in particular, to resettle Russians in South America
and Africa." As we remember, Wetzel proposed sending
part of the Poles, and not Russians at all. There is nothing about Africa in the “remarks”
words. In addition, the leading “Hitlerologists” have also shown themselves to be remarkable
specialists in the field of philology, stating that physical destruction
must be meant not only by the word “Germanize”, but also by the words
"deport" and "resettle".

In attempts to find confirmation of the thesis about plans to exterminate the Slavs
Soviet propagandists did not disdain to resort to the help of others, so
or dubious sources. For example, in the collection “Criminal Goals -
criminal means" published "Political Testament" of Private
Gustav Hildebrandt. It is clear that the value of such a “most important
document" raises big questions.

Anti-fascist scientists eagerly quote the speeches of a number of
leaders of Germany. Reichsführer SS G. Himmler is especially popular.
Thus, Chernaya in her book “Brown Dictators” writes that “on the eve
attack on the Soviet Union, Himmler stated that one of the goals of the campaign against
The East is the destruction of 30 million Slavs." This statement
completely false. It was borrowed from a propaganda article by I.
Ehrenburg during the war. By coming up with these kinds of messages
Jewish writer fulfilled a social order, inciting bestial
hatred of everything German, and calling for the physical destruction of German
women and children.

Now let us ask ourselves how the leaders really treated
Germany to the Slavs.

It's no secret that the ideology of National Socialism was based on
racial theory. Many researchers try to deny the scientific value
teachings about races, that's their business. It is important that for the leaders of the Third Reich
blood issues were of utmost importance. Hitler wrote: "Sins against
blood and race are the most terrible sins in this world. Nation,
who indulges in these sins is doomed."

In a number of monographs, sometimes very valuable from a factual point of view,
the authors make the same mistake: the Nazis considered the Slavs “subhumans”
and wanted to destroy them. For example, modern researcher Boris
Kovalev, in his book about the Nazi occupation regime, notes: “After
the Nazis' rise to power in Germany received official support
use eugenics - the “science” of racial hygiene." The goal of eugenics, according to
The author’s belief was to “determine the optimal number of “untermensch”.
The latter included Jews, Gypsies and Slavs."

In order to refute this amateurish statement, let us turn to
one of the leading racial theorists of Nazi Germany, Hans Günther.
In his works, he clearly distinguishes between the concepts of people and race. Race, by
Gunther, "this is a single group of people who differ from others in a special way,
its inherent combination of physical characteristics and mental properties,
which always reproduces only its own kind."

The Germans, like any European people, consist of several races: "Peoples
one race or, more correctly, one racial mixture can speak different
languages, and peoples speaking the same language differ from each other in
racially. But the most important thing: peoples are always racial mixtures and
never a race." The most "valuable", according to Gunter, is the Nordic race.
It is present in varying proportions in all European nations.
The percentage of Nordic blood among Great Russians is very significant and in general
higher than that of the Germans themselves. This opinion was shared by other German
racologists. Fritz Lenz noted as early as 1915: “In racial terms
Muscovites are closer to the Germans."

It is clear that racology in Germany was not some abstract thing at all.
scientific discipline. Her conclusions and recommendations were carefully listened to
leaders of the party and state. Scientific calculations of racologists are actively
used in legislation. One of the most important laws of the Reich is
"Law on the citizenship of the Empire and the protection of German blood and German
honor" dated September 15, 1935. Let us quote an excerpt from
of this document: "German blood does not form its own race. German
the people are made up of representatives of different races. But to all these races
characteristic is that their blood is mutually compatible and the mixture of these bloods in
difference from blood, which is not related to them, does not create obstacles and
stress. One can, without a doubt, equate the blood of those
peoples whose racial composition is related to the German people. This
applies to all peoples inhabiting the spaces of Europe. Blood,
related to German, is treated equally in all directions.
Therefore, representatives living in Germany can become citizens of the Empire
minorities, for example Poles, Danes, etc."

Thus, the Slavic peoples, and, of course, the Russian people
officially recognized in the Reich as racially related, fraternal ethnic groups.
What is the point of destroying your brothers - this is the simplest question that
we address Kovalev, Chernaya and others conscious and unconscious
falsifiers of history.

Our conclusions are also confirmed by historical facts. Slavic states -
Bulgaria, Croatia, Slovakia were loyal and staunch allies of the New
Europe, taking part in the crusade against Bolshevism. Croatia and
Slovakia, by the way, was personally obliged to gain its independence
Hitler. In the ranks of the Wehrmacht and SS troops they fought against communism
Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Bulgarians, Czechs, Poles.

Why did Dr. Goebbels sincerely admire the bravery of the Russian soldiers?
liberation army? Why did Alfred Rosenberg write that "Russia
“is this a country that has preserved the true image of Christ in its breast”?
Why did Adolf Hitler donate hundreds of thousands of Reichsmarks for the construction
Berlin Orthodox Cathedral and for the renovation of dozens of Russian churches, and
called the Russians a “GREAT PEOPLE”? Very simple. Because
The National Socialists never wanted to destroy the Slavs!

Did Hitler want to destroy the Slavs? The last words heard from Hitler's lips.

Password recovery