Creation and activities of the embassy order. Formation and development of the diplomatic service in Russia in the 16th-17th centuries

From under arrest for denunciation of Prince Dmitrov. Yuri Ivanovich 1534 - 1536 .

Cases and documents of the Ambassadorial Prikaz 1589 - 1706 : about the receptions of ambassadors, including J. Fletcher (neg.) 1589 ; about trips to Russia of foreign military personnel (including those hired by Colonel A. Leslie 1631 - 1633 ), engineers, craftsmen and other specialists and their services; about trade in Russia by Armenian, Belarusian, Greek, Indian and other merchants, including paintings of foreign merchants in Moscow 1644 ; on issuing privileges to foreigners to set up factories; on the management of Novomeshchanskaya Sloboda in Moscow; on the issuance of travel certificates to merchants and people from captivity and the detention of persons who do not have certificates; about ransom from captivity; about the construction and settlement of Voronezh and Yelets in 1585 - 1593, incl. painting of Yelets boyar children 1593 ; on the replacement of local and monetary salaries for service people of different categories (including the service Tatar princes Yusupov, Tsarevich A. Kaibullin, Bolkhov, Meshchersky, Putivl and Rylsky children of boyars, Russian and Zaporozhye Cossacks); about sending Russian students abroad; on the compilation, translation and binding of books in the Order; on the receipt and expenditure of the treasury, including for the maintenance of foreign embassies 1588 - 1706 ; on the construction and repair of buildings, including the Ambassadorial Prikaz on Ilyinka and Pokrovka 1631 - 1696 , courtyards of Little Russian 1669 - 1698 and Krymsky 1682 - 1700 (there is an inventory 1700 ); on the personnel of the Posolsky and the orders and traveling huts subordinate to him, including on the payment of salaries to English, Greek, German, Persian, Tatar, Turkish, Swedish interpreters and translators 1589 , about the services of A. L. Ordin-Nashchokin, about his library and archive 1680 . Detective cases about escapes abroad XVI - XVII centuries, including the architect P. Maly (Fryazin) 1539 .

DOCUMENTS OF THE VLADIMIR, GALICIAN, NOVGOROD AND USTYUG QUARTERS

Cases and documents 1505 - 1704 : about land ownership in Pskov, Solvychegodsk and Ustyuzhensk uy., including letters of grant from the Ryazan lord. book Oleg Ivanovich Olgov Ryazan Monastery 1372 (cop. 1680), Ivan IV Pskov Assumption "on Zavelichye" Church 1578 , serfdom deeds, hundreds of letters from scribe books and other documents about the lands of the Stroganovs, bishops' houses, Kirillo-Belozersky, Savvo-Storozhevsky Zvenigorod, Simonov Moscow, Trinity-Sergius and other monasteries 1505- 1598 ; on the management and state of Arkhangelsk, Vladimir, Vologda, Vyatka, Galich, N. Novgorod, Novgorod, Pskov, Solvychegodsk, Tver, Tula, Yarensk, etc., including the decree of Ivan IV to the Yarensky and Solvychegodsky settlements 1582 , appointment case

- 235 -

Archimandrite Michael bishop of Pskov 1589 , documents about the tavern 1652 , monetary 1654 - 1662 and urban 1699 reforms; on the appointment and change of city administration, its abuses, including abuses of the Novgorod administration 1593 ; on construction and repairs in cities, including fortresses in Vologda, N. Novgorod, Novgorod, Smolensk, Gostiny Dvor in Arkhangelsk 1670 - 1674 , Novodvinsk fortress 1701 - 1704 ; on the collection of Streltsy, Polonyanichny, Yamsky, data and quitrent money, customs, tavern and other taxes, including the collection of request money by K. Z. Minin 1614 ; on the description of lands and population census; on the transfer of rent and farm-out of customs houses, taverns, bathhouses, government mowing areas, wastelands, fishing grounds and other lands; about townspeople of different categories - their state and city services, auctions, land ownership (including G.L. Nikitnikov, Pankratyevs, Sveteshnikovs, Stroganovs, Filatyevs, V.G. Shorin, Shustovs), allocating space for their yards, shops, workshops, the struggle with feudal lords for lands and tax-payers, elections of representatives to Zemsky Sobors (including the Council of 1648 - 1649), about their self-government and judicial affairs.

The “single message” of the Totem ship carrier workers is that they should “stand for each other” in front of the governor (cop.) 1653 . Instructions to governors, lists and estimates of cities, census books of trading premises in towns, customs charters XVII - XVIII centuries. Judicial civil cases of townspeople, monasteries, landowners, Russian and foreign merchants, painting of property and dowry XVII - AD XVIII centuries .

DOCUMENTS OF MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

Documents of orders: Policeman 1577 - 1578 - letters to the governors of the cities occupied during the Livonian War (Viljana, Dorpat, Kokenhausen, Pernov) and their notes on the supply of garrisons, the organization of Yamsk service, the inspection and repair of fortifications, the placement of service people in Gapsala; Local 1610 - 1678 - cases about the distribution by the government of Prince Vladislav of palace and black lands based on petitions from the boyars and service people of various ranks (including Prince I. S. Kurakin, Prince B. M. Lykov, F. I. Sheremetev), about confiscation possessions of Vladislav’s political opponents (including Prince D. M. Pozharsky) 1610 - 1611 , painting of peasant households in the possessions of the highest spiritual and secular feudal lords 1678 ; Gathering of military people 1637 - 1654 - cases of collecting dating people and money for them; Pushkarsky 1646 - inventory of cases; Big treasury 1652 - 1660 - statement of receipts and expenses; Lithuanian 1654 - 1667 - affairs on the management of Vitebsk, Mogilev, Nevel, Orsha and Polotsk with y.; Little Russian 1654 - 1705 -

- 236 -

Cases on the appointment of governors to the cities of Left-Bank Ukraine, on Russian garrisons, etc.; Smolensky 1657 - 1669 - cases of Polish and Lithuanian prisoners of war.

Cases and documents of the palace, discharge, Siberian and other orders 1582 - 1705 : about the appointment, change and abuses of governors, including the civil strife between the Mangazeya governors G. I. Kokorev and A. F. Palitsyn 1629 - 1634 ; about popular uprisings, including uprisings in Veliky Ustyug, Moscow, Novgorod, Pskov 1648 - 1650 , about the Peasant War led by S. T. Razin 1669 - 1671 (in memory of the exile of participants in the uprising in Yaitsky town 1669 , about sending a serviceman to the atamans K. Yakovlev and M. Rodionov with a demand to take action against S. T. Razin 1670 , an extract about the actions of the Razins on the Volga and the Caspian Sea 1670 , decree on sending A. A. Shepelev’s regiment against the rebels 1670 , a letter from the Totem governor about the danger of an uprising in the district 1671 ), about the Solovetsky uprising 1676 , about the uprising of the peasants of the Simonov Monastery in Yaroslavl district. 1680 ; about the fight against political crimes, including about the traitor F. Andronov 1613 , about the investigation of G.V. Talitsky 1700 ; about the fight against “heresies” and schism; about the exile, capture and escape of convicts, including documents about the exile of participants in the “Copper Riot” 1662 and Streltsy uprisings 1682 - 1698 to Arkhangelsk, Vyatka, Kevrol, Pustozersk, Kholmogory and to Siberia, correspondence of quarterly orders with governors on the maintenance of convicts 1670 - 1674 , murals of exiles 1671 (Siberia), 1673 (Veliky Ustyug), 1674 (Kholmogory); about the flight of serfs, townspeople, etc., including black-mown peasants of Zaonezhsky churchyards 1647 - 1654 ; about the Votyaks, Karelians, Komi-Zyryans, Lapps, Mordovians, Nenets, Cheremis, Kasimov, Kungur, Romanov and Siberian Tatars and other peoples of the Volga region, the Urals and the North; about state and townsman artisans (Russian and foreign), architects (including B. Ogurtsov 1625 , O. D. Startsev 1694 - 1697 , bridge builder Elder Filaret 1691 ), painters (including K. I. Zolotarev, L. Kislyansky, I. Maksimov 1626 - 1700 ), watchmakers (including H. Galovey 1626 - 1633 , A. Virachov 1650 - 1672 ), carpenters, masons, blacksmiths, tailors and furriers, bone carvers, etc.; about Moscow settlements, including Barashevskaya 1582 , Yamskikh 1622 - 1702 , Kadashevskaya 1627 - 1701 ; about lands and buildings in Moscow, including an inventory of boyar households (neg.) 1588 , documents about the Old and New money courts 1638 - 1702 , paintings of courtyards of Moscow suburbs 1653 ; on the management of the palace economy, including the palace estates of the Treasury, Ogorodnaya, and Sadovaya Slobodas 1624 - 1701 , about the delivery of animals and birds to the Semenovsky amusement yard 1634 - 1697 and Kholmogory cattle for the royal household 1671 ; on the management of escheated and confiscated estates, including Moscow courtyards and the property of the prince. I. P. Shuisky 1589 , boyars N. I. Romanova

- 237 -

1652 - 1655 , clerk I. I. Bolotnikov 1668 - 1676 , boyars A. S. Matveeva 1682 , boyars book V. V. Golitsyna 1690/91 , about the collection of income from the estate of the prince. I. Mstislavskaya 1639 ; about state-owned and private factories and plants (Kashira, Olonets and Tula iron-making, potash, brick, etc.), including about Pushechny 1627 - 1702 and pomegranate 1667 - 1680 yards, gunpowder mill 1666 , factories - morocco 1669 - 1674 , paper (on the Yauza River) 1673 - 1676 , silk by Z. Paulsen 1686 - 1687 , cloth by I. Tabert 1696 , glass Y. Romanova 1699 ; about shipbuilding, including the construction of the ship "Eagle" in the village. Dedinove Kolomenskogo u. 1669 , ships on the river. Voronezh 1696 - 1697 ; about the wars with Crimea, Poland, Turkey and Sweden (including about the production of ammunition in Ustyuzhna Zhelezopolskaya, about the Moscow elected regiment of A. A. Shepelev, about the Olonets soldier regiments, about the regimental musicians - “vulture makers”, about the collection and the purchase of “fur coats” for soldiers, the search for fugitives, the purchase of weapons abroad); about the Northern War, including the organization of the defense of Arkhangelsk 1701 - 1705 ; on the expenditure of the treasury, including on the construction and repair of walls and towers of the Moscow Kremlin and Kitay-Gorod (estimate list) 1646 , Arkhangelsk Cathedrals 1670 and St. Basil's 1674 , Simonova 1682 and Novodevichy 1684 - 1688 monasteries, Kremlin palaces 1685 - 1688 , Ivanovo Bell Tower 1688 , for the maintenance of pharmacies 1671 - 1700 , for the maintenance of the court theater and the training of actors at the school of I.-G. Gregory 1671 - 1705 , for the maintenance of the school of Simeon of Polotsk 1676 and Slavic-Greek-Latin Academy 1686 - 1691 .

Fragments of office work of the Execution Chamber under the Boyar Duma 1681 - 1694 . Fragments of the personal archives of the boyars. book V.V. Golitsyna (correspondence with clerk E.I. Ukraintsev) 1682 and guest K.P. Kalmykov 1689 - 1700 .

The reason for the invitation to the Radio Russia studio Alexander Vladimirovich Yakovenko, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia, became the Day of Diplomatic Worker, which is celebrated on February 10...

(Listen to the audio recording of this conversation)

- We have many different professional holidays, but Diplomatic Worker’s Day as a professional holiday is less known than others. Why is this holiday celebrated on February 10, what is its history?

YAKOVENKO: The holiday is relatively young: the decree was signed in 2002. Since that time, Russian diplomats have been celebrating their professional day. Although the choice of the date of the holiday is far from accidental, it is directly related to the history of the domestic diplomatic service, namely with the creation of the first foreign policy agency of Russia. On this day in 1549, there is the earliest mention in historical documents of the Ambassadorial Prikaz - the first government structure in the history of our country that was involved in foreign affairs.

Actually, from this time the countdown began; The country's leadership decided to celebrate February 10 as Diplomat's Day. By the way, there is an interesting feature here: this professional holiday is called Diplomat’s Day, and not just “Diplomat’s Day”. The diplomatic service is not only diplomats, it is people of various professions - the same translators, people who ensure the work of embassies. Therefore, this is a common holiday not only for people who negotiate. This is a holiday for diplomatic couriers who carry diplomatic mail and other embassy employees. It is important that all of them are involved in the professional celebration.

- Our employees from many structures have uniforms: investigative agencies, prosecutors, even railway workers. How are diplomats' uniforms different?

YAKOVENKO: It is really very beautiful and has a long history. It existed both in tsarist times and during the Soviet Union. The light uniform was used in countries with hot climates, primarily in Asia and Africa, where it is quite difficult to wear thick cloth. The dark form has been used on other occasions and in other countries. But the decision to recreate the uniform of the Russian diplomat was made precisely on the days when the decree was signed in 2002. The uniform of a modern Russian diplomat resembles the Soviet one, but, of course, it is different: different symbols, a coat of arms, although the concept itself has been preserved.

There is no summer uniform - it is only dark, and diplomats wear it on three occasions. First of all, when the ambassador comes to the country and presents his credentials; This is the first visit to the head of state, and the Russian ambassador comes to the meeting in uniform. By the way, have you noticed that some of the foreign diplomats, those who wear uniforms, also come in uniform when presenting accreditation certificates to the meeting with the President of Russia?

The second occasion when wearing a uniform is permitted is on public holidays. An ambassador, while in the host country, may come to a reception in honor of a national holiday in uniform. Naturally, this emphasizes the peculiarity of the solemn moment, and many ambassadors take advantage of this. Although this does not happen often. And, naturally, now that we have established Diplomatic Worker’s Day, all diplomats wear a uniform on this holiday.

I must say that only the top leadership has a uniform: in this case, these are ambassadors extraordinary and plenipotentiary, the highest diplomatic rank of the Russian foreign service; There are also extraordinary and plenipotentiary advisers of the 1st and 2nd classes. In Soviet times, all this was equivalent to high general ranks. If we take this entire hierarchy, this is what everything looks like today. It’s probably not worth drawing parallels with a military uniform, but, of course, it demonstrates the level of a diplomat. By the way, the uniform is embroidered with gold thread...

- And if we talk about the role of Russian diplomacy in international relations? For example, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Soviet Union Andrei Gromyko was known as “Mr. No”, a man with a very tough position. In your opinion, is current Russian diplomacy more flexible than Soviet? It is clear that in any case national interests are defended, but there are nuances...

YAKOVENKO: Regarding Gromyko, I do not entirely agree with his interpretation as “Mr. No”; this is basically a Western interpretation of Gromyko. The fact is that he worked in a certain coordinate system, and he could not draw any other line other than the line of the state. And if he did not agree with some elements - and then there was a rather tough confrontation, there was a Cold War, a serious confrontation (and everyone remembers this) - then a large number of various agreements were still reached. In particular, in 1945 there was The UN Charter was signed, where Russia was an active participant in the creation of this organization. A large number of disarmament agreements were signed, and a lot of other agreements were reached that met the interests of not only our country, but also other states...

After reading this book, you will become acquainted with the events that took place during the reign of Ivan the Terrible, Boris Godunov, Mikhail Fedorovich and Alexei Mikhailovich. You will understand the significance and essence of the activities of the Ambassadorial Prikaz - one of the central most important state institutions of Russia in the 16th-17th centuries. Using numerous archival sources, which are based on the collection of ambassadorial books of the RGADA, the author talks about the formation and evolution of the first diplomatic institution of Russia. The book talks about the following interrelated areas: the history of the Ambassadorial Prikaz and its documentation, the history of diplomatic relations, biographies of prominent diplomats and the leaders of the Ambassadorial Prikaz. The stormy and dramatic era of the formation of the Russian state, its foreign and domestic policies will appear before you through the prism of the life and activities of civil servants. The atmosphere of the work of the Ambassadorial Prikaz and the circumstances of foreign trips of Russian ambassadors are reproduced. Comparing the fates of the organizers of domestic diplomacy, the author shows how their image, self-awareness and diplomatic methods have evolved over the course of two centuries.

The foreign and domestic policy of medieval Russia is inseparable from the Ambassadorial Prikaz, an institution that developed and implemented its main directions from the end of the 15th to the beginning of the 18th century. To conduct diplomatic service, each country had its own attributes inherent to a certain era: institutions, staff, etiquette, customs, forms and exchange of information, diplomatic documentation and even language. The significance, functions, and composition of the employees of the Ambassadorial Prikaz changed in accordance with state building and the complication of the foreign policy tasks facing Russia. This was the time of the formation and strengthening of the Russian centralized state, the liberation of the country from the Horde yoke, the strengthening of sovereignty and the emergence of broad international ties with both the East and the West, and Rus'’s access to the shores of the Pacific Ocean.

During the strengthening of centralized power, the Boyar Duma sometimes interfered with the implementation of autocratic policies. Already during the reign of Grand Duke Vasily III (1505–1533), a private council of the sovereign arose, consisting of the closest and most trusted persons, the so-called Near Duma. The most complex issues of domestic and foreign policy were previously discussed by members of the Middle Duma, and then the prepared decision was submitted for approval to the Boyar Duma. The composition and strength of the Near Duma depended entirely on the tsar.

Diplomatic documents call its members “close Duma members”; they are most often mentioned as the tsar’s personal representatives during negotiations with foreign diplomats “about the state’s secret affairs.” While abroad, Russian ambassadors explained that “great affairs of our great sovereign are carried out by great Duma people of the Near Duma.” The remark of Ivan IV the Terrible to the English ambassador is characteristic: “... for a long time we have not known what we, the great sovereign, should say to the ambassadors ourselves.” This custom continued into the 17th century. Famous diplomat AL. Ordin-Nashchokin wrote to Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich: “In the Moscow state from time immemorial, as in all states, embassy affairs are in charge of the people of the secret Middle Duma.”

The French officer, Captain Jacques Margeret, who enlisted in Russia in 1600, in his notes from the beginning of the 17th century. described the composition of the Boyar Duma as follows: “There is no specific number of members of the Duma, since it is up to the emperor to appoint as many as he pleases. During my time it reached thirty-two members. The Privy Council for matters of special importance usually consists of the emperor’s closest relatives... Moreover, the Duma keeps two Duma clerks, whom I consider to be secretaries rather than chancellors, as they interpret it. One of them is the one to which all ambassadors and matters of foreign trade are sent. The other is the one in whose department all military affairs..."

In the middle of the 16th century. In the palace mansions of the Moscow Kremlin there was a chamber that served as the permanent meeting place of the Duma. In the 17th century, during the reign of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich (1645–1676), the Duma most often met in the so-called Front Chamber. There is also documentary evidence of meetings of the boyars in the Golden and Dining Chambers. If the tsar left Moscow, the boyars followed him, and meetings of the Boyar Duma could take place in Izmailovo, Kolomenskoye, Trinity-Sergius Monastery, etc.

A “response commission” was appointed from the composition of the Boyar Duma - boyars, treasurers and clerks. She was entrusted with conducting negotiations with foreign ambassadors. The commission was officially called “advisers”, “big people”, “who live in the Grand Duke’s hut”, and was the link between the Boyar Duma, headed by the Grand Duke, and foreign diplomats. Russian historian S.A. Belokurov names the composition of the commissions of the Boyar Duma, which were appointed to meet with various ambassadors from 1497 to 1561.

The ambassador who arrived for an audience with the sovereign presented his credentials and then retired to one of the chambers of the Kremlin palace. Under Grand Duke Vasily III Ivanovich, ambassadors were received in the Embankment Chamber (1522), in the Middle Hut (1527; 1548), and Brusyanaya Exit Hut (1539). From the middle of the 16th century. Almost all receptions took place in the Dining Room, and at the end of the century - in the Middle Golden Subscription (1586) and Faceted (1591) chambers. After some time, a response commission appointed for negotiations came to the ambassador to listen and convey his “Speeches” to the head of state. Previously, the commission received an order to conduct negotiations: the “big people” “against the speeches” of the Grand Duke “responsed with the boyars.” The commissions usually consisted of one or two, and in especially important cases, three members of the Boyar Duma; their assistants were clerks (two or three people). If the rank of a foreign diplomat was not high enough or the diplomatic question was not of great importance, then a clerk could be sent to answer without the boyars.

annotation

Keywords

Time scale - century
XVII

Bibliographic description:
Kunenkov B.A. The structure of the Ambassadorial Prikaz in the second quarter of the 17th century // Studies on source studies of the history of Russia (before 1917): collection of articles / Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Russian History; resp. ed. A.I.Aksenov. M., 2003. P. 99-120.

Article text

Kunenkov B.A.

STRUCTURE OF THE EMBASSY ORDER IN THE SECOND QUARTER OF THE 17TH CENTURY

The question of the structure of state institutions of the Moscow State was studied using materials from the second half of the 17th century, including the Ambassadorial Prikaz, and was reviewed in general terms by S.A. Belokurov. He established that the districts, which he compared in their functions with the departments of the ministry, “existed at the very beginning of the second half of the century (XVII. - B.K.)”, since the first mention of them that he discovered dates back to 1654. There is data in which S.A. Belokurov saw “a hint of the existence of rises in 1647”; he even admitted that they existed in the first half of the 17th century. The study showed that his assumption was correct, and the order actually had unique “departments”. True, no specific permanent name for these “departments” is found, but their existence is beyond doubt. In the documents of the Ambassadorial Order, in four cases these structural units are called tables.

The first time the name “table” in the meaning of the administrative “department” is found in the second half of 1633: “At Rodion Yuryev, Pomesny was sent to the order of the clerks Ivan Prikaskin to his Rodionov’s table for one thousand four hundred rubles.” Another mention of tables dates back to around the same time. “Summer 7142, September on the 15th day. Take for a monthly salary food for soldiers near Smolensk. ... Grigoriev to Lvov’s table 798 rubles 22 altyns and give to the clerk Garasim Stepanov”, “and Grigoriev to Lvov’s table four hundred nineteen rubles twenty-six altyns three money and four hundred fifty-two rubles that remained from the German feed from the clerk Tretyak Nikitin.” “At the clerk's office, Oleksei Korepanov left Pomesnovo to the order of the clerks Gerasim Stepanov and Olekseev to the arrival of Money two thousand eight hundred one ruble eleven altyn two dengi. “From Oleksei Korepanov, echo Kholpya of the order of the clerk Yurya Tyutchev, I will accept five hundred rubles... From the clerk of Rodion Yuryev, the dismissal of the clerk Yurya Tyutchev and Rodionov, I will accept one thousand seven hundred rubles. Yes, from Rodion the clerk Gerasim Stepanov received him and Rodionov received three hundred twenty-eight rubles, six altyns, five money and four hundred and fifty-two rubles, which were left over from the German feed from the clerk Tretyak Nikitin.” From this excerpt it can be understood that in 1633 the order had four organizational components, led by clerks G. Lvov, A. Korepanov, R. Yuryev, T. Nikitin. In May 1640, there was another mention of the table: the letter from the Livensky governor about the return of the borrowed money of the Crimean arbacheys was “at the clerk of Oleksei Korepanov in the Crimean table.” In what follows, we will conventionally call the structural components of the order “departments.” The above persons were old clerks; All of them at that time constituted a “big” article, which did not include any of the officials except them. Probably, the persons who were in charge of the “department”-table in the order (in 1633 - R. Yuryev and G. Lvov) actually maintained a separate table in the department premises, at which they worked; the rest were sitting at a common table. The term “howl” does not appear even once. Thus, S.A. Belokurov’s opinion about the existence of some organizational components in the Ambassadorial Prikaz is confirmed, but we cannot name them with complete confidence. In what follows, we will conventionally refer to them as “departments.”

Considering that there were 9 clerks in the second and third articles in the order, we can assume that each “department” consisted of 3-4 employees. In 1644-1645 the number of “old” clerks remained unchanged - 4, and the number of employees in “smaller” sections increased to 16-18 people, and the staff of “departments” increased accordingly.

Apparently, clerks from the “department” that was in charge of relations with the country to which this embassy was sent took part in drawing up orders for embassies. True, their participation was only technical and consisted of rewriting the materials of the order. Thus, the draft order for the great embassy of A.M. Lvov to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1644 was copied by four clerks: I. Khonenev (middle), F. Kashkin (young), S. Mikhailov-Ushakov (young), O. Dmitriev ( average) . Apparently, these persons constituted the “department” of T. Vasilyev-Nikitin, in which Polish affairs were handled. They could carry out courier communications with diplomatic missions, if it concerned particularly important documents; the embassies were located within the Moscow state. On May 31, 1644, O. Dmitriev caught up with the embassy of A.M. Lvov along the Mozhaisk road and gave him a “letter of faith” and a secret order. The duties of young clerks included copying of order documentation; employees of the junior group of the “smaller” article were called “pischiki”. This is how E. Rodionov-Yuryev and I. Martynov were called “pischiki” in the first year after entering the service.

All 11 clerks of the first article, who served in the Ambassadorial Prikaz in 1613-1645, carried out memorials and extracts on matters related to equipping diplomatic missions abroad, paying salaries to their participants and employees of the order. Sometimes middle clerks did the same, but extremely rarely. Thus, the average clerk M. Fokin, who served in the second article for more than 20 years and did not receive a promotion until his death, left three certificates, and all three relate to the last year of his life. Apparently, clerk A. Lukin also belonged to the second article, but he corrected the document only once. Thus, based on the rights of the old clerks, one can determine the specialization of the “departments” that they supervised.

In addition, in the notebooks and receipts and expenditure books of the Ambassadorial Prikaz there are references to the transfer of certain affairs to the jurisdiction of different clerks.

Finally, in the published Inventories of the archives of the Ambassadorial Prikaz in 1626 and 1673. there are references to the personal archives of old clerks-boxes with documentation that passed through their hands, described after their death or resignation: “Pillar of the luxurious Tretka Vasiliev about his seat from December 152 to the 1st of 154,” “ pillar, and in it are counting lists of clerk Tretyak Nikitin of the 152nd, 153rd, and 154th years”; a box in which “after the death of clerk Alexei Korepanov, what files were taken from him”; "pillar of the lavish roses of the year 152 by Mikhail Volosheninov". Analysis of Inventory data is another way to establish the names of the heads of “departments” and determine the range of issues prepared in these “departments”. It makes it possible to check data from archival sources. In this case, it is necessary to take into account the length of service of a particular official.

As for the clerks of the other two articles, they were entrusted with the mechanical copying of texts “as a model” when drawing up orders for Russian embassies departing abroad, or when receiving foreign missions. The youngest (by age) and lowest paid employees of the “lesser” category were called “pischiki”. So E. Rodionov-Yuryev, I. Klavyshev, I. Martynov were called “pischiki” in the first year after joining the Ambassadorial Prikaz; they all had a salary of up to 8 rubles. The selection of information could be carried out by old clerks, sometimes even from “foreign” “departments”: the speeches of the bailiffs at the reception of the Danish ambassador M. Yul were prepared by D. Odintsov and T. Nikitin - both officials of the “big” article; Duma clerks edited the orders.

In the 10s of the 17th century (from 1613), it was possible to find the certificates of only three clerks - A. Shakhov, I. Zinoviev, Y. Lukin. In 1620, the first two constituted a “large” article, the third, who received a salary of 30 rubles, can be considered a medium article. During these years, M. Matyushkin also served in the first article, but his certificates of that time were not found, which can be explained by the paucity of documentation remaining from this period. For the same reason - the lack and fragmentary information in the few surviving files of those years - it is problematic to determine what A. Shakhov was in charge of, and what I. Zinoviev was in charge of.

The first clerk of the order, Ivan Zinoviev, in 1617 made a statement about the addition of salaries to the Seversky boyar children who traveled to Lithuania with instructions to collect news and exchange prisoners, in 1618 - about the salary of the same Seversky boyar children; in the same year he made a deed regarding the salary of a Ryazan serviceman. No later than December 1619, he left the order. From these scant data we can conclude that one of the issues under the jurisdiction of I. Zinoviev was Polish affairs.

From 1618 to 1627, Alexei Shakhov was first on the list of old clerks. In 1618, he handled matters regarding the reward for the German (Swedish) Polonyanniks for leaving, and the salary for messengers from Pskov; about the sovereign's salary for translators in Staraya Russa; about the salary of the Old Russian nobles for various services, about the salary of the Novgorod nobles of the Obonezh Pyatina. On November 11, 1619, he commemorated the salary of Tula resident V.F. Sukhotin for his release from captivity. In March 1623, he made a request from the order of the Great Parish regarding income from the city of Elatma. January 19, 1620 - about the salary of the widows of the Turkish colonists, October 5, 1623 about the addition of a salary to the messenger to Persia I. Brekhov.

Thus, one can get a more complete picture of A. Shakhov’s competence than of I. Zinoviev’s responsibilities. This included, apparently, technical preparation of issues related to the management of the northern regions of the country; in A. Shakhov’s “department” materials on relations with Sweden, Turkey, and Persia were processed.

There are other sources that allow us to judge Shakhov’s specialization. In the archives of the Ambassadorial Prikaz there was a box in which “at the clerk of Oleksei Shakhov, after he was sent to Unzha, there were still things left: extracts of who had previously traveled as ambassadors to Poland and their titles and sovereign’s salary; list of letters of False Dmitry I to Boris from Kyiv; letter of January 2, 113 from Hermogenes to the governors; extracts about Lithuanian messengers; extract about ambassadors from 92 to 107; who was in response from 74 to 113; list with the answer given to Posnik Ogarev in Lithuania.

Yes, Oleksei has files in his drawer in addition to his list: Extract from 69 to 109 “who were sent in response to the Lithuanian, Caesar and English ambassadors. Negotiations with Zholkiewski about the baptism of the prince. A bundle of all sorts of discord."

So, having compared the data of archival materials and the data of the Inventory, we can conclude that the range of issues subordinate to A. Shakhov was very wide: documentation on sending diplomatic missions to Poland passed through his “department” (this responsibility passed to him from the “retired” I. Zinoviev). Shakhov also prepared data for negotiations with England and the House of Habsburg, with Sweden, Turkey, and Persia. It may seem doubtful that relations with almost all the main counterparties of Russian diplomacy were concentrated in the hands of one official, but in the early 1620s in the Ambassadorial Prikaz there were only three old clerks with a salary above 30 rubles who had the right to make inquiries (M. Matyushkin, A. Shakhov, T. Nikitin), and the amount of work assigned to each of them was slightly greater than that of the clerks of the 1630s - 1640s. In 1627, Shakhov was exiled to Urzhum.

In the documents of the 1620s, the certificates of only one clerk were found - M.G. Matyushkin. This official appeared in the Ambassadorial Prikaz no later than 1616 and in 1624 he was granted the position of clerk. Back in 127 (1618/1619) he took money from the Ustyug cheti - 30 rubles “for household expenses.” In April 1624, he inquired about the salaries of the falconers and falconers traveling to the Crimea, in the summer of 1622 - about the salaries of the interpreters when hiring the new interpreter I.M. Ievlev and about the salaries of the newly baptized Tatars. Both documents were made shortly before Matyushkin received his promotion. Thus, it can be assumed that this clerk was responsible for the service of interpreters and translators, serving Tatars, and was in charge of the economic affairs of the order (“expensive expenses”) and relations with the Crimean Khanate.

About the work of departments of the order in the 30s - the first half of the 40s. XVII century documents allow us to judge more definitely.

Lvov Grigory Vasilievich. Enlisted in the Ambassadorial Prikaz in 124 (1613/1614), he was first mentioned with the salary of an old clerk in 1631, but there is no doubt that he moved to this rank much earlier. On April 25, 1637, Lvov became a clerk.

The Inventory of the Archive of the Ambassadorial Prikaz reports that in the box “at the clerk Grigory Lvov” there were “books of the sovereign’s joys” - the marriages of Mikhail Fedorovich with M.V. Dolgoruka and E.L. Streshneva, correspondence with D. Chaplin, the bailiff under M. Khlopova in Nizhny Novgorod. There is also a “vacation” and a “dangerous letter” for the Englishman A. Di (Diya), sent to England “for the sovereign’s secret business”, a list of the sovereign’s salary for the newly baptized Tatars, prepared for the baptism of Y.K. Cherkassky and V.Ya. Suleshev, and the court case of the Romanov posad people. All these cases date back to 1624 -1627.

He inquired about the salary of the Dutch translator B. Bogomoltsev in October 1628; July 19, 1631 about the salary of the newly baptized and Saltan-Murza Sheidyakov; about salary for service in Sweden; about the salary of the translator I. Rekhtyrev, sent “to interpret the unskilled military men on Belaya”; about the salary of all clerks for Easter 1632 and about the salary of old clerks for R. Yuryev’s comparison with them; memory in the Great Parish of the provision of benefits to burnt clerks on August 16, 142 (1634); about how much was given to whom for Easter on April 1, 1632 (140); about the reward to the blacksmith F. Nikitin, who made “an iron door for the window in the Ambassador’s quarters” (in March).

He also inquired in October 1633 and April 30, 1634 about the addition of salaries to the nobles - participants in V.G. Korobin’s embassy to Denmark, translators for the same “Danish service”, about rewards to the nobles who traveled to Holland as part of Gapyabyev’s mission, statement of the salary of S. Lvov and K. Kondratiev, former messengers to Denmark in 141

All these facts indicate that G. Lvov was in charge of English, Swedish, Danish, and Dutch affairs; service of translators, interpreters, and serving Tatars at the end of the 1620s; administrative management (“expensive expenses”). At one time he was also responsible for clerks, but in 1632 this issue came under the jurisdiction of R. Yuryev (see below), and after the death of the latter it was returned to Lvov.

Dear Petrov Odintsov, a former Astrakhan clerk, taken to the Ambassadorial Prikaz as a translator, in 1628 he was transferred to clerk. In the early 1630s, he was the first on the list and the highest paid (45 rubles) employee in the “big” article. Extracts he sent about the size of the annual salaries of interpreters and translators for 138 in January 1631 and in March 1632 for 140, about the compensation of the translator I. Koshaev's salary, about the additional payment to the interpreter L. Minin of the unpaid half of the salary; July 21, 1631 - about the salary of Kan-Murza Sheidyakov, serving Murzas and newly baptized people, in January 1632 - about the salary of the newly baptized Tatar princesses indicate that the issues of the service of interpreters and translators were removed from the jurisdiction of G. Lvov and transferred to D .Odintsov by 1630, and the services of feed and local service Tatars - in July 1631.

The inventory of the archive of the Ambassadorial Prikaz of 1626 allows us to get an idea of ​​​​D. Odintsov’s competence: in his box were kept correspondence with Astrakhan governors, files on relations with Persia, Crimea, the Lesser Nagai Horde, the Bukhara Khanate, Zaporozhye, “the Kasimov pillar about all sorts of matters.” The Inventory data is confirmed and supplemented by materials from the RGADA funds.

Odintsov made a memorial: on August 19, 1631, about the salary of I. Shapilov for the Nagai service, twice about the salary of the Turkish colonists, about the salary for the Turkish service, about adding to the salary of the interpreters - participants in the embassy to Turkey I. Kondyrev and T. Bormosov. He compiled statements “for example” when equipping the embassy of A. Sovin and M. Alfimov in July 1630, the embassy of A. Pronchishchev and T. Bormosov in 1632, about the salary of the boyar’s son R. Gorbatov “for Cherkassy service”, about salary for a sable boy who participated in A. Sovin’s embassy to Turkey.

D. Odintsov also wrote “in a report” about the salary of the Persian Polonyanniks “for leaving Kizylbash” in 140 (1631/1632), about the size of the ransom of the Polonyanniks in January 1632, about the addition of a salary to the interpreter F. Yelchin “for the Kizylbash service » May 23, 1632; these facts confirm that his “department” processed documentation on Russian-Persian relations.

Certificates about awards to servants who participated in the embassy to the Great Nagai Horde in September 1630, about the salary of the Astrakhan clerk G. Milogotsky and the Astrakhan boyar children, who in 1632 went with the Nagai and Edisan Murzas on a campaign against Poland indicate that Odintsov was in charge of Nagai affairs .

Finally, on the right about the dacha to the tenant I. Poroshin “for the Don parcel” in March of the same year shows that relations with the Don Army also fell within the competence of D. Odintsov.

Having verified the data of published and unpublished archival materials, we come to the conclusion that the clerk D. Odintsov was in charge of the service of interpreters, translators and village Tatars, the affairs of the Kasimov “kingdom”, the Cossacks of Don and Zaporozhye. He was also responsible for a wide range of issues relating to relations with the countries of the East: Turkey, Persia, the Bukhara Khanate, both the Nogai and Yedisan hordes. Odintsov’s certificates on the Crimean cases were not found.

Rodion Yuryev, who was included in the Ambassadorial Prikaz immediately in the “big” article in 1631, died on May 7, 1635. Apparently, he took over some of the cases from D. Odintsov and G. Lvov. The first documents prepared by Yuryev in 140 (1631/1632) are the memories of the salary of the translator Ya. Elagin and interpreters “for the Crimean service”; at the end of 1631, he wrote an extract “as an example” about giving an allowance for a courtyard building to the translator B. Baitsyn. In the same year 140, he issued dacha records three times to immigrants from Turkish and Crimean captivity “for leaving” and for “saddle blanket patience.” He also made notes: in October 1631 about the dacha “for fire destruction” for clerks who were fire victims, in the fall of 1633 - “for example” about the size of the clerks’ salaries to pay them the other half of their salaries for 142; about the comparison of M. Evstafiev in salary with his “brothers, young clerks”; probably about a salary of 140. Thus, R. Yuryev was in charge of Crimean and Turkish affairs and the clerk’s service.

He was also involved in the economic affairs of the order, also confiscated from G. Lvov: in 1634 he bought writing paper in the Vegetable Row. “At Rodionovo, Yuryev’s place was taken in the Posolskaya order by clerk Mikhail Volosheninov.”

Alexey Lukich Korepanov worked continuously until the end of the period under study. It was not possible to establish who his predecessor was. A significant part of the cases passed through Korepanov’s “department” concerned Russian-Crimean relations. The first of these documents dates back to 1630 - 1631: in February 1630, the clerk inquired about giving money for ransom to the Crimean Polonian Liveni Cossack F.M. Bely, in February 1631 he inquired about the salaries of the villagers who returned from the “Crimean parcel” ", about giving "for complete patience" to the Crimean Polonyanka. Two certificates of Korepanov, made in 1631, fell within the competence of D.P. Odintsov, who was mentioned above: firstly, on June 9, he commemorated the determination of daily food to the newly appointed interpreter I. Esipov, and secondly, he made an extract about the salary “for complete patience” to the Turkish field worker M. Fedotov. Probably, Korepanov was not involved in Turkish affairs and the affairs of interpreters for long, after they were taken from Odintsov, and before he was entrusted to R. Yuryev, who was again taken into the order. Crimean affairs were also transferred to Yuryev.

The next one on the right, Korepanova, is found only in April 1634 on an inscription about the increase in the salary of the interpreter B. Tinchurin for the Crimean service. Then, in August 1637, he prepared two memoirs about compensation “for losses and for losses” in Crimea to the translator A. Alyshev. Aleksey Lukich compiled statements about the salaries of the falconers, falconers and hawkers “for Crimean parcels” on October 11, 147 (1638), about the addition of salaries to employees who traveled to the Crimea - translator I. Koshaev in August 1641, interpreter D. Doyunov and translator K. Ustokasimov in 1643, about equipping the villagers R. Tevkelev and K. Koshaev to the Crimea on October 30, 1644; in the fall of 1643 - to the clerk S. Bushuev, who was in Crimea with the embassy of B. Priklonsky, and to the village resident Araslan-Murza Aidarov, who took the “light” wake to the khan.

Korepanov was also responsible for the reception and maintenance of diplomatic missions of the Crimean Khanate, as evidenced by the following entry: “At the podyachevo, Oleksei Korepanov has 4 rubles left over for feeding the Crimean messengers.” In Korepanov’s box in the archives of the Ambassadorial Prikaz there was kept “an extract from the petition of the Ambassadorial Prikaz of clerks for registration in the Crimean parcel, which was not sent against the previous registration with Grigory Neronov.”

Korepanov had to resolve issues related to the training of specialists for Crimean affairs. So, in February 1643, he commemorated the assignment of a salary to the clerk P. Zverev, who on his own initiative studied the Tatar language to serve as a translator, in October 1644 - about the compensation of a new Tatar translator.

Relations with the Lesser Nogai Horde were also under the jurisdiction of Korepanov: in March 148 (1640) he commemorated the award to the archers “for the Kazyev service.” He was preparing a mission to Moldavia: in 1630: he made a note about the amount of help for the interpreter P. Sagalaev, who was going there with the envoy B. Dubrovsky.

In 1643, Aleksey Lukich bought things in Sedelny Ryad for “light funerals” in the Crimea. On March 7, 1645, he made a statement regarding the costs of repainting the rear chamber of the order. On July 20, 1645, he took boards for the sovereign's business. He wrote about various business purchases on February 5, 23 and 27, 1645. On June 13, 1645 he wrote about business expenses for the year 153. These facts indicate that in the first half of the 1640s, Korepanov’s “department” was involved in the economic affairs of the order. It is noteworthy that in the 1620s, the administrative management and Crimean affairs were also in charge of one “department” - M. Matyushkina.

It is also possible that Korepanov was in charge of the affairs of the city of Romanov. On September 27, 1636, the statement about the salary of the Moscow Romanov streltsy was written in his hand.

Finally, in 1635-1636. Korepanov was responsible for preparing the affairs of the Don Army. He issued salary statements: November 5, 1635 to the village of P. Fedorov, March 25, 1636 to the village of P. Savelyev, May 19, 1636 to the village of A. Nikiforov, June 10, 1636 to the village of D. Darfenev, July 21 and 11 September 1636 to the village of N. Fedorov.

Mikhail Dmitrievich Volosheninov was the successor of the deceased R. Yuryev and “inherited” from him the affairs of the service of clerks, watchmen and gold writers: in 1636, he commemorated the salaries of clerks on the name day of the Tsarevich in 144. He kept records of the annual salary of all translators and interpreters on 147 (1638/1639), on 151 (1642/1643), on giving money “for a yard building” to the translator B. Lykov in December 1639, on benefits to the family of the deceased translator B. Abdulov and on benefits to the widows of translators I. Kuchin, A. Angler, S. Iskelev, P. Grabov, in June 1642 on the hiring of interpreter L. Pirogov, and in 1643 - interpreters N. Polikostritsky, L. Pirogov, K. Ivanov, in September of the same year - about benefits to the widow of the suddenly deceased K. Ivanov. Then in the same month these responsibilities were assigned to T. Vasilyev-Nikitin.

On September 9, 1635, he inquired about the salary in Moscow for the Kazan residents in 141-143. In 1637, when determining the salaries of envoys S.I. Islenyev and M.K. Gryazev who returned from Persia, Volosheninov issued a statement of salaries to all envoys and clerks - heads of embassies to Persia and Turkey since 1621. In 1642, he issued statements of salaries to ordinary participants embassies to Denmark S.M. Proestev and I. Patrikeev. Thus, Danish affairs in the early 1640s were in his “department”.

Volosheninov prepared report notes: December 30, 1636 about the salary of the village of I. Convict and other winter villages since 129, January 23, 1637 - about the salary of the same I. Convict in money, damask and cloth, March 9, 1637 - about the salary of the winter village of T. Yakovlev, and on September 3, 1639 - to the messenger to the Don, the son of the boyar F. Kozhukhov and the Don leaders (Voluy and Korchensky), as well as the Voronezh village resident T. Mikhnev. Thus, for some time he was also in charge of Don affairs.

Nikitin Tretyak. During the period under study, two old clerks with the same name served in the Ambassadorial Prikaz. In 1632-1635, one of them had a salary of 45 rubles, signed as “Grenka Nikitin”. I inquired about the award to G. Neronov, who traveled as a messenger to the “Golsten land” in July 1636.

Nikitin Tretyak Vasiliev left more of his certificates than other old clerks. Referred to in documents as Tretyak Nikitin, he himself always signed himself as “Trenka Vasiliev”; his salary until January 1644 was 41 rubles, then 45.

The receipt and expenditure book of 1644 says that on September 22, 1643, “the remaining money was two thousand seven hundred and eighty-two rubles seven altyns with the money Mikhail Volosheninov gave to the clerk Trtyak Vasiliev, because Mikhail, by the sovereign’s decree, ordered him to be in the dyatsekh, and the parish and the expenses were ordered by the Duma deacon Grigory Lvov and he Mikhail to be in charge of the clerk Tretyak Vasiliev.” Two conclusions can be drawn from this message: firstly, T. Vasiliev-Nikitin was appointed to replace Volosheninov, and secondly, that one of the responsibilities of the first clerk was maintaining receipts and expenditure books. Although he was the first old clerk on the list, he received a salary lower than his comrades in the article (41 rubles) until he was matched with them.

Data from the Inventory of the Archives of the Ambassadorial Order of 1673 allow us to assert that in T. Nikitin’s “department” documents were prepared on relations with Sweden and the Patriarchate of Constantinople. According to the Inventory of the Archives of the Ambassadorial Prikaz of 1626, T. Nikitin’s box contained two lists of the agreement between M.V. Skopin-Shuisky and J.P. Delagardi on the hiring of “German military men”, eight cases on the delimitation of the Russian-Swedish border, a letter from the Greek metropolitan Sergius to Patriarch Philaret “about alms”. This data is duplicated by the entry in the order’s receipt and expenditure book: “At the pyachevo of Tretyak Mikitin, what remained of the Hungarian ambassador with Yakov Rusel and with the German and Greek recluse, as he was released in 142. 42 rubles 20 altyn." J. Roussel appeared in Russia as a Swedish diplomatic agent. Nikitin was also in charge of Georgian affairs: in the fall of 1639, he inquired about giving a salary for 148 to the translator I. Boyarchikov and the interpreter L. Minin, who had visited Georgia with the embassy of F.F. Volkonsky and had not yet received a salary; in October 1644 - about the award to the translator I. Polshchikov “for Georgian service”.

In the notebook for 1639-1643. it is reported that “Trenka Vasiliev” took into his “department” the replies of the Terek and Astrakhan governors on the affairs of the Nagai and Edisan Tatars, one reply on the oath of the Kalmyk taishas.

On August 28, 1644, T. Nikitin drew up a list of Turkish soldiers brought from Istanbul by the embassy of I.D. Miloslavsky, and made a document about their salary “for blanket and convict patience.” He also made inquiries about the salaries of the nobles who accompanied the Turkish ambassadors, about the provision of daily food to the Turkish messenger, about the salaries of the Streltsy centurions who accompanied the Polish messengers from Vyazma to Moscow in October and December 1644 and in April and June 1645, about the ransom of the Russian polonyannik, who escaped from the Ambassadorial Court from the Polish Ambassador G. Stempkowski. In 1644, when equipping the great embassy of A.M. Lvov, G.G. Pushkin and M.D. Volosheninov, G.V. Lvov celebrated the funeral with “soft junk” and commemorated the salaries of all participants in the embassy. This indicates that T. Nikitin was in charge of affairs regarding relations with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Ottoman Empire, which corresponds to the data of S.A. Belokurov, that in 1646 Polish and Turkish affairs were at the same level.

Many of his documents are connected with the affairs of clerks, watchmen and gold writers. He made statements: in December 1643 and in December 1644 about the salaries of clerks for the Nativity of Christ, twice - about the size of the annual salaries of clerks and watchmen in the 152nd and 153rd years, about holiday dachas for clerks on the queen’s name day in February 1644 and in March 1645, the prince in March 1643, on Easter 1643 and 1644; on holiday salaries for young clerks newly hired; about the salary of the gold painter P. Ivanov for 153. Thus, all matters regarding clerks, watchmen and gold painters no later than March 1643 were under the exclusive jurisdiction of T. Nikitin. The latest case concerning this category of employees dates back to June 1644 - this is an extract about a monetary dacha for the sovereign's angel day 152.

In September 1643, we meet on the right “Grenki Vasiliev” on the statement of salaries for interpreters and translators and fodder foreigners. In December 1644 he commemorated the annual salaries of translators and interpreters for 153, in March 1644 he compiled notes on the affairs of interpreter T. Angler and translator M. Sakharnikov, in July of the same year - about the appointment of interpreter T .Golovacheva, in 1645, an extract about the salary of “Greeks and Voloshenin” for leaving “in the sovereign’s name for eternal service” and about the payment of the sovereign’s salary to the newly baptized. These data indicate that in 152 (1643/1644) Nikitin was assigned to manage the affairs of clerks, watchmen, gold writers, as well as interpreters, translators and foreign servicemen instead of M. Volosheninov, who had gone for promotion. From September to December 1643, M. Fokin was responsible for the category of interpreters and translators (see below); the conclusion suggests itself that this responsibility was assigned, as a temporary assignment, to T. Vasiliev, then transferred to Fokin, and then returned to Tretyak. Perhaps in September 1644, I. Khripkov began to manage these affairs (see below).

In addition, Tretyak prepared a memory of sending 40 silver plates taken from an English merchant to the Grand Palace on January 26, 1644, a memory of sending 500 rubles to the Great Parish to pay for yachts to a certain Dutchman on February 17, 1644. He was probably busy with business foreign nationals living in the Moscow state.

Summing up, we can conclude that T. Vasiliev-Nikitin in 1644 had the broadest competence, which included Polish, Swedish, Turkish, Georgian affairs, affairs of the Eastern patriarchates, the service of first clerks, gold writers and watchmen, then simultaneously translators and interpreters (since September 1643), fodder foreigners.

In September 1643, Mina Fokin issued an inscription on the daily food given to serving foreigners; December 1, 1643 - on the annual salary of translators and interpreters for 152. In 152 (1643/1644) - on the salary of interpreters and translators. Here we have a case where the average clerk with a salary of 30 rubles performed the functions of an inquiry officer. Perhaps this appointment took place due to the fact that Fokin, who had served in the second article for 11 years, was soon to be transferred to the first article, but he died less than a year later, on May 28, 1644.

Sukhorukov Yakov made a statement on February 14, 1638 about salaries for Voluy leaders and about parcels to the Don; January 7, April 6 and June 12, 1638 - on the sovereign's salary to the winter villages from 141; July 15 and 26, 1638 - about the salary of Voronezh residents - informants on the Don. He also made inquiries about the salaries of the participants in the embassy of S.I. Islenyev and M.K. Gryazev to Persia - the clerks, in August 1638 - the translator and interpreters, the sableman, falconers, hawk-keepers and falconers. On April 28, 1639, Sukhorukov died.

The sources do not give a complete picture of the competence of M. Volsheninov and Y. Sukhorukov; it can be argued that the first was responsible for Danish affairs, the second for Persian affairs. The fact that both of them made statements about the award to members of the same diplomatic mission can be explained as follows: Volosheninov, the first clerk of the order with a salary of 50 rubles, made statements about the envoys themselves, Sukhorukov - about the other participants in the embassy. Perhaps it was the responsibility of the first clerk to provide salary certificates to heads of embassies.

Don affairs were first under the jurisdiction of Volosheninov, then they were transferred to Sukhorukov, but after the death of the latter they were returned to Volosheninov.

Ivan Prokofiev Khripkov made statements in August 1641 about the amount of the allowance for transporting the family of the translator M. Magametev from Astrakhan and the salary for the rise of the translator B. Abdullov, who also moved from Astrakhan at one time; about the salary of translators who traveled to Persia with the embassy of S. Volynsky and S. Matveev. On May 28, 1645, a memory was written to them about how much money to give to the Persian ambassador for the journey. On November 11, 1639, he issued an inscription on the salaries of Turkish prisoners - “Greeks”, “Araps” and “Turchens”; December 30, 1639 about the salary of the Greeks for subordinateship; On January 3, 1640, he made a report on the Polonyanniki - Astrakhan and Moscow archers; on increasing the salary of interpreter K. Romanov in September 1644